Blur Busters Forums

I will never get over how we got rid of good CRT displays for all these garbage LCD as replacement and we all accepted it like there was nothing wrong. Imagine if we supported the CRT industry today we would have 240HZ CRT just imagine the kind of CRT we would be using today It's not like we had th...

For people who value motion > 8-) *Panasonic ST60 Plasma - Streaming, Blu-ray's and maybe DVD's(depending on screen size) *QD-OLED - Modern gaming, at 120fps preferably, or using Black frame insertion if you can't handle the base/vanilla high persistence and low Mclarity. *CRT - Retro SD gaming, DV...

Motion clarity nuts need to remember real eyes experience motion blur too, we just don't want any added on top of it by the display, same goes for latency; the ultimate goal with any external peripheral is for the human body to become the only bottleneck, which "ain't even close to perfect" either....

If only BFI worked properly for low frame rate content such as movies & TV. being able to drop from a 16ms persistence down to even 8ms with a Samsing S90C or S95C QD-OLED would be a blessing. If you're OK with 720p60 input or 1080p24 input, you can do this with Retrotink 4K! BFI at any custom Hz, ...

Sounds like a dream, in theory. Very expensive but if it's the solution we're looking for and given the fact that the market is non-existent, then the price becomes relative. And it could open the path and serve as an example for TV manufacturers, to put efforts on implementing better BFI algorithms...

For people who value motion > 8-) Which should concern everyone, i mean...a TV is supposed to display moving images permanently, unless for those who desire a giant digital photo frame. *Panasonic ST60 Plasma - Streaming, Blu-ray's and maybe DVD's(depending on screen size) *QD-OLED - Modern gaming,...

The concept of "motion resolution" has always puzzled me, i'm not sure what it truely means actually. From what i've seen so far, no plasma is comparable to CRT in terms of motion clarity, even the best models ever produced. Just the closest technology behind it along with DLP. But it's soooo much b...

Personally, i'd definitely choose 144 Hz + BFI because the flicker would be unnoticeable at this refresh rate. The motion itself would be much clearer, because while sample-and-hold displays become less and less blurry with higher refresh rates, they can't compete with the motion clarity induced by ...

120fps on my LG C1 OLED when gaming makes a HUGE difference Vs regular 60fps without BFI. You're cutting down half the motion blur, doubling up on motion clarity, getting that life-like buttery smooth 120 and shelving latency down to 5ms without ANY compromises and it can be used in tandem with HDR...

I can't wrap my head around the people that get ecstatic over Dolby Vision & HDR strictly in terms of movie/TV watching. You're sacrificing motion clarity & persistence with both since using BFI defeats the purpose for both formats. You can't have it both ways. :P You CAN get HDR + 120fps when gami...