Hello to all
I wanted to know if the new benq xl 2540 240 hz has less input lag than other 144 hz or 2411z 144hz best? ?
i play cs go all the time and i want less input lag possible
thanks to everyone for the answers
xl2540 vs other 144hz
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 06:45
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
yes what?Q83Ia7ta wrote:yes
- lexlazootin
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 02:57
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
More HZ = Less latency.
It's only by a tiny amount but yea.
It's only by a tiny amount but yea.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 06:45
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
less latency of 2411z or 2530 more tatency?..........lexlazootin wrote:More HZ = Less latency.
It's only by a tiny amount but yea.
- lexlazootin
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 02:57
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
240hz has less latency then the 144hz
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11653
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
Correct.lexlazootin wrote:240hz has less latency then the 144hz
As a rule of thumb:
- More framerate, same Hz = less lag
- Same framerate, more Hz = less lag
- Doing both = even less lag
Which is to say for higher Hz, same frame rate situations:
- 100fps at 240Hz = less latency than 100fps at 144Hz
- 300fps at 240Hz = less latnecy than 300fps at 144Hz
And higher frame rate, same Hz situations:
- 300fps at 144Hz = less latency than 100fps at 144Hz
- 300fps at 240Hz = less latency than 100fps at 240Hz
This generally applies to all real-time scanout TN LCD monitors, which most eSports displays are -- including the BenQ/Zowie XL series.
This is something we noticded on the side, in VSYNC OFF modes (non-GSYNC) during our GSYNC 101 lag tests on a 240Hz monitor (later sections, "Beyond the Scanout").
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 20 Sep 2017, 06:45
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
yes but I had read around that the 2450 had more input than 144 hz lagsChief Blur Buster wrote:Correct.lexlazootin wrote:240hz has less latency then the 144hz
As a rule of thumb:
- More framerate, same Hz = less lag
- Same framerate, more Hz = less lag
- Doing both = even less lag
Which is to say for higher Hz, same frame rate situations:
- 100fps at 240Hz = less latency than 100fps at 144Hz
- 300fps at 240Hz = less latnecy than 300fps at 144Hz
And higher frame rate, same Hz situations:
- 300fps at 144Hz = less latency than 100fps at 144Hz
- 300fps at 240Hz = less latency than 100fps at 240Hz
This generally applies to all real-time scanout TN LCD monitors, which most eSports displays are -- including the BenQ/Zowie XL series.
This is something we noticded on the side, in VSYNC OFF modes (non-GSYNC) during our GSYNC 101 lag tests on a 240Hz monitor (later sections, "Beyond the Scanout").
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11653
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
Where did you hear that? Zowie/BenQ monitors have generally been extremely low lag, supporting real-time scanout.krypton111 wrote: yes but I had read around that the 2450 had more input than 144 hz lags
If you're talking about XZ2546 strobing, remember that DyAc can also be turned off via service menu or Blur Busters Strobe Utility.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: xl2540 vs other 144hz
some additional info for this topic -
I have a 2720z and a XL2540 and to keep it simple. All testing for me is Overwatch 300 fps, no blur reduction just purely trying to get the best input 'feel'
2720z DVI-D - feels great but the refresh difference is noticeable after some months of owning the XL2540
2720z Displayport - feels worse
XL2540 DVI-D 'Overclocked' to 240hz felt great BUT it no longer displays this resolution in Overwatch without using CRU ( Previously using Nvidia control panel to OC.) I'm fairly new to CRU so I'm still not sure if you can make CRU change Desktop Refresh rate aswell as game Refresh.
XL2540 Displayport - Would rather be using DVI-D but the gain in image smoothness is really noticeable over 144hz.
I myself am quite curious is there is a true latency difference between DVI-D and displayport, everything that I've read has told me it would be placebo effect. Maybe there is something in frame time lows? Basically it's beyond me but I do feel there is a difference.
I have a 2720z and a XL2540 and to keep it simple. All testing for me is Overwatch 300 fps, no blur reduction just purely trying to get the best input 'feel'
2720z DVI-D - feels great but the refresh difference is noticeable after some months of owning the XL2540
2720z Displayport - feels worse
XL2540 DVI-D 'Overclocked' to 240hz felt great BUT it no longer displays this resolution in Overwatch without using CRU ( Previously using Nvidia control panel to OC.) I'm fairly new to CRU so I'm still not sure if you can make CRU change Desktop Refresh rate aswell as game Refresh.
XL2540 Displayport - Would rather be using DVI-D but the gain in image smoothness is really noticeable over 144hz.
I myself am quite curious is there is a true latency difference between DVI-D and displayport, everything that I've read has told me it would be placebo effect. Maybe there is something in frame time lows? Basically it's beyond me but I do feel there is a difference.