I was testing a old Panasonic HDTV against a 120hz monitor I have with human benchmark
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/
And I averaged about 111 ms faster on the 120hz monitor
But when I tested with timer here:
http://tft.vanity.dk/
It measured the difference at only 50 ms.
Any theories on what's going on here?
Testing input lag via timer vs human benchmark
Re: Testing input lag via timer vs human benchmark
dunebeetle wrote:I was testing a old Panasonic HDTV against a 120hz monitor I have with human benchmark
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/
And I averaged about 111 ms faster on the 120hz monitor
But when I tested with timer here:
http://tft.vanity.dk/
It measured the difference at only 50 ms.
Any theories on what's going on here?
The tests themselves have input lag. So you can't really compare between different tests.
Re: Testing input lag via timer vs human benchmark
back when human benchmark was flash i got more or less the same result on it as i did on a custom program i made myself to do the same thing at >1000fps
anyway using timers is really unreliable for measuring input lag
also if you have aero on, 120hz has less vsync lag than 60hz
anyway using timers is really unreliable for measuring input lag
also if you have aero on, 120hz has less vsync lag than 60hz