There are multiple causes of latency in DVI or DP. There's the transciever/packetization latency which is independent of the dotclock latency. Reducing input lag by a faster dotclock is one technique, but the monitor needs to support it. It is theoretically possible to deliver a 1080p refresh cycle in only about 5 milliseconds over DisplayPort, and if using both channels, you can push that down to as little as apporoximately 2.5 milliseconds -- theoretically allowing 1080p @ 400Hz or 4K @ 100Hz. Using reduced chroma (e.g. 4:2:0), you could probably squeeze 4K @ 120Hz over existing DisplayPort bandwidth.RealNC wrote:Why is DP faster? Higher pixel clock? Does that mean that we can lower input lag over DVI by tweaking the timings? (Reduced vs standard CVT, for example.)
There is a lot of opportunity for future displays to reduce latency further via DisplayPort, via faster frame refresh delivery. GSYNC is a part of this, since frame delivery occurs at the full GSYNC maximum refresh rate, regardless of the current GSYNC framerate/refreshrate. e.g. 30Hz with the low latency of 144Hz.