Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Breaking news in the gaming monitor industry! Press releases, new monitors, rumors. IPS, OLED, 144Hz, G-SYNC, Ultrawides, etc. Submit news you see online!
Post Reply
Edmond

Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by Edmond » 10 Jun 2015, 01:27

Dont know the model number.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC3rvxIlvmE

From Acer!
Yep, Acer is turning into the leader slowly. (And Asus are turning into whiny bitches)

Although, i would wait for the IPS version.

User avatar
masterotaku
Posts: 436
Joined: 20 Dec 2013, 04:01

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by masterotaku » 10 Jun 2015, 12:43

One step closer to 3840x2160@120+Hz. And for the love of [insert favourite deity here], give us ULMB at low refresh rates. That high resolution is lost in movement!
CPU: Intel Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz
GPU: Gainward Phoenix 1080 GLH
RAM: GSkill Ripjaws Z 3866MHz CL19
Motherboard: Gigabyte Gaming M5 Z270
Monitor: Asus PG278QR

Falkentyne
Posts: 2793
Joined: 26 Mar 2014, 07:23

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by Falkentyne » 10 Jun 2015, 18:17

50 to 100 (or 120-144 depending on panel speed) hz ULMB in 1 hz increments or bust.

I mean Benq did it...

Edmond

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by Edmond » 11 Jun 2015, 02:34

Sensitive people dont want to see ANY flicker AT ALL.. at ANY refresh rate. I`m one of them.

Normal people dont mind it if the refresh is high enough. Thats why you never see ULMB below 85hz or 100hz sometimes.

Its a minority actually who have a skull so thick they wouldnt mind the flicker @ 30hz.

User avatar
rabidz7
Posts: 48
Joined: 21 Jul 2014, 11:36
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by rabidz7 » 21 Sep 2015, 08:15

Edmond wrote:Sensitive people dont want to see ANY flicker AT ALL.. at ANY refresh rate. I`m one of them.

Normal people dont mind it if the refresh is high enough. Thats why you never see ULMB below 85hz or 100hz sometimes.

Its a minority actually who have a skull so thick they wouldnt mind the flicker @ 30hz.
Then turn off the ULMB.
Rabidz7 is a: PowerPC Fan, LCD and x86 Hater, and a Plasma/OLED/CRT/SED/FED Lover

Falkentyne
Posts: 2793
Joined: 26 Mar 2014, 07:23

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by Falkentyne » 21 Sep 2015, 11:21

Edmond you're getting very close to a ban with the persistent flaming. Keep the name calling to a minimum. If you don't like flicker then don't use it. Some of us grew up with 50-60hz flickering TV's and didn't bat an eye.

Edmond

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by Edmond » 22 Sep 2015, 05:31

Falkentyne wrote:Edmond you're getting very close to a ban with the persistent flaming. Keep the name calling to a minimum. If you don't like flicker then don't use it. Some of us grew up with 50-60hz flickering TV's and didn't bat an eye.
Okok, im sorry. I dont know why my dick is so small.

Still hate flicker tho. Black frame insertion or ULMB i actually dont mind. Its the flicker of low quality screens that has no benefits even, that i cant stand.

MrBonk
Posts: 11
Joined: 27 Mar 2015, 03:55

Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz

Post by MrBonk » 22 Sep 2015, 17:56

60hz flicker is not a problem when you are used to it.
Shit, when you are used to and can deal with 480i flicker,everything else is a piece of cake.

It's like flyback 15khz whine with just about every CRT. You get used to it.

I use a CRT regularly for old consoles and aside from my consumer set having some issues(Frequent magnetization,blooming,trails on fast Dark to Light/Light to Dark transitions), 60hz motion is amazingly smooth and nearly perfect.

30hz flickering on the other hand WOULD be unusable

I'd kill for a sub 90hz 4k ULMB monitor.

Plus there is always the part where it's adjustable. Use a lower level. Still get some blur reduction.

Post Reply