As I understand it, the key to motion blur reduction using the above is to have the strobing occur at the same rate as the frames per second being displayed. So, 60fps @ 60hz, 120fps @ 120hz, etc.
Take, for example, the Sony x850C, which Rtings ( http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/x850c ) showed, using the Clearness setting anything below 5 results in a frequency of flickering at 120hz, except at clearness 5, which does so at 60hz.
So, my theory is that at Clearness 5 setting you would want to be running the monitor at 60hz, and if you were to run the monitor at 1080p @ 120hz, then Clearness 4 would be better as it flickers at 120hz. Is this correct? If so, would a TV like the x850C be a good solution to motion blur for someone who wanted to game on a larger screen than is otherwise available with montior blur reduction technology (i.e. larger than 27 inch)?
Having read a lot of forums, including this one, it seems a lot of people consider that HDTVs are considered poor for the purposes of obtaining blur reduction. However, given that it is possible to both induce motion blur reduction without interpolation, and to run the screen at a higher than 60hz resolution at 1080p, a modern HDTV appears to be at least an acceptable alternative if large-screen gaming is desired.
Hoping for some clarification before I go putting down $$$ on checking my assumptions.
