Chief Blur Buster wrote:It is a matter of perspective. Some people (such as myself) has viewed it as a bug, while others view it as normal. But either way, the "fix" is here -- it's the V2 firmware -- and I'm happy there's a solultion now, and people can now install V2 firmwares on their monitors if they wish (using an MSTAR ISP upgrade).
Either way: What's done is done. Blur Busters Strobe Utility turns the strobe crosstalk from "worse than LightBoost" into "competitive with LightBoost", while still having better colors than LightBoost and having a massively wider persistence adjustment than LightBoost. The great thing is, with the Blur Busters Strobe Utility, is that persistence is fully adjustable all the way from clearer than "LightBoost 10%" all the way to much brighter than "LightBoost 100%". This is good for fans of the adjustable-persistence feature.
.
Is it really a matter of perspective? They went for the good input stats and accepted the strobe crosstalk in the middle of the screen for it, which is where it matters most, in hope nobody would actually complain. I sold my prior xl2411t lightboost monitor with nearly 40% loss in value and expected something competetive with lightboost plus better colors and features like low blue light/black eQualizer right from the beginning. Now, we have a solution. But it is required to either send it in or program it on your own. This is a $500 monitor, not some arduino project.
I don't blame you, infact, like many others, I really appreciate all the work you put in. Nothing would have changed otherwise and there is no real alternative to this monitor at the moment. Still, you might see my point.