[PHOTOS] Accurate Photos of Display Motion Blur [some HDTVs]

Everything about displays and monitors. 120Hz, 144Hz, 240Hz, 4K, 1440p, input lag, display shopping, monitor purchase decisions, compare, versus, debate, and more. Questions? Just ask!
spacediver
Posts: 505
Joined: 18 Dec 2013, 23:51

Re: [PHOTOS] Accurate Photos of Display Motion Blur [some HD

Post by spacediver » 15 Jun 2014, 16:58

well done :)

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11647
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: [PHOTOS] Accurate Photos of Display Motion Blur [some HD

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 14 Aug 2014, 01:02

The Technical Paper has now been completed & first draft has been submitted.

This paper will be be presented in Japan -- Alas, I'm not 100% sure I can afford to attend. That said, coauthorship is with one large government sccience organization and one large company -- and this pursuit camera technology I've invented is being released into the public domain (patent-free).
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

spacediver
Posts: 505
Joined: 18 Dec 2013, 23:51

Re: [PHOTOS] Accurate Photos of Display Motion Blur [some HD

Post by spacediver » 14 Aug 2014, 01:05

very glad to hear about the patent free approach - was that something that you insisted on?

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11647
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: [PHOTOS] Accurate Photos of Display Motion Blur [some HD

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 14 Aug 2014, 01:12

spacediver wrote:very glad to hear about the patent free approach - was that something that you insisted on?
Oh, it just came into being. I considered patenting the approach, but several considerations:
- It is so niche market, it is hard to profit off
- It is a creative use of inexpensive existing equipment
- For a technical paper with the parties involved, it is more practical to keep the pursuit camera technique in public domain.
- I published information on the pursuit camera technique more than a year ago, so it's too late to patent anyway.

There is more more to gain in reputation from this, than financially.

All you really need is a $100 camera slider and a $200 camera, and you've got an accurate accuracy-verified hand-driven pursuit camera that is competitive in accuracy with a motorized pursuit camera.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Post Reply