Everyone.
One important consideration: Input lag
60fps @ 120Hz has much less VSYNC ON input lag than 30fps @ 60Hz on the same display.
Frames refreshed faster onto the screen surface. Instead of a 30fps frame being scanned-out onto the panel in 1/60sec, you now have a 30fps frame scanned-out onto the panel in 1/120sec.
That _really_ makes a big difference.
Also, VRR ranges needs to be huge so that you don't get the VSYNC ON input-lag increase effect at 60 frames per second. You need to run at framerates below VRR maximum, to fully eliminate the backpressure input lag that is common to VSYNC ON or when hitting maximum framerate on a VRR monitor.
As people know from the various GSYNC articles on Blur Busters, we cap a few frames per second below max Hz. We were the world's first to measure the input lag of variable refresh rates back in year 2012 ... (FreeSync is a variable refresh rate tech, similar to GSYNC). So, 60fps would have no VSYNC ON lag due to it never being VRR max. So 60fps FreeSync has much less input lag if the FreeSync monitor is at least approximately ~61Hz or higher (preferably ~65Hz or higher).
So giving consoles 120Hz + VRR is a two-way input-lag fix:
--> Reduction in input lag from faster 120Hz refresh cycles of 30fps or 60fps content; AND
--> Reduction in input lag from no longer hitting VRR maximum.
Just one of the two is a big lag reduction.
Having both is having cake and eating it too.
Low-lag 30fps and low-lag 60fps FTW!
120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
If you enable 60fps FreeSync, you aren't getting lag-saving benefits of capping below FreeSync max Hz.
Instead, Enable FreeSync and enable 120Hz simultaneously.
(Once the 120Hz software upgrade arrives, and you've got a 120Hz+ FreeSync Monitor)
Now you're getting much-lower-lag 60fps because 60fps is no longer the VRR max.
Conclusion:
In addition, with proper variable refresh rate support, the stutters of varying refresh rates can be reduced or eliminated (see TestUFO Simulated animation of FreeSync) so that's a bonus benefit with framerates between 30fps and 60fps. And the bonus framerate swings above 60fps. But you still benefit anyway at 60fps and less.
Instead, Enable FreeSync and enable 120Hz simultaneously.
(Once the 120Hz software upgrade arrives, and you've got a 120Hz+ FreeSync Monitor)
Now you're getting much-lower-lag 60fps because 60fps is no longer the VRR max.
Conclusion:
- 120 Hz is not useless for 30fps and 60fps games
- It reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps
In addition, with proper variable refresh rate support, the stutters of varying refresh rates can be reduced or eliminated (see TestUFO Simulated animation of FreeSync) so that's a bonus benefit with framerates between 30fps and 60fps. And the bonus framerate swings above 60fps. But you still benefit anyway at 60fps and less.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
In best case scenario it would indeed cut a few dozen ms off input lag, we need to wait and see how ms implements this feature.
If the games dont switch the Hz mode once u start them and can be forced to output at 120hz, we might see some input lag reduction.
However 30fps usually gets doubled when using freesync/gsync, i dont know if the input lag doubles in such cases or not.
If the games dont switch the Hz mode once u start them and can be forced to output at 120hz, we might see some input lag reduction.
However 30fps usually gets doubled when using freesync/gsync, i dont know if the input lag doubles in such cases or not.
Falkentynes BenQ Service Menu thread: http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
It doesn't.MrBrown wrote:However 30fps usually gets doubled when using freesync/gsync, i dont know if the input lag doubles in such cases or not.
However, the lag reduction at 30FPS when using VRR is not that big as Chief makes it out to be, since at 30FPS you're not hitting vsync backpressure, like you do at 60FPS/60Hz But motion consistency is very much improved. At 30FPS, single-frame hiccups (repeats) are 67ms (33.4ms is the frame time at 30FPS, and with vsync you sometimes repeat one frame due to the frame limiter's accuracy, and suddenly the frame stays for twice that long.) That's huge and quite visible and annoying. These cannot be avoided, since frame limiters aren't perfect (they don't sync to the monitor's refresh.) VRR (at least g-sync) completely fixes this though and these stutters go away completely. You can already do that in non-VRR mode by using 1/2 vsync (behaves like 30Hz vsync), but THEN the input lag that wasn't there before appears, since now you do get vsync backpressure. But at 30Hz, vsync backpressure is huge.
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
No. Scanout lag gets halved.MrBrown wrote:However 30fps usually gets doubled when using freesync/gsync, i dont know if the input lag doubles in such cases or not.
This is because the video cable transmits the "30fps" frame in only 1/120sec.
While there is no vsync backpressure, you defintely have a faster frame transmission.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
I have tested Wolfenstein 2 on Xbox X yesterday. Theres a Demo of this game, so everyone can test it for free.
In the game settings its possible to disable dynamic resolution. Then the game runs at native 4K with the framerate dropping to low 50s / high 40s.
My Asus VP28UQ which has Freesync 1 support over HDMI wirked fine with 4K @ Freesync on Xbox X. It even has an option to show framerate and it did show the framerate going to low 50s in many areas.
I went to areas with low 50fps and tested a bit- there was no stutter, game was smooth, so Freesync worked. However Ivenoticed massive input lag. Alot higher that enabling dynamic resolution ingame. Not sure if the engine itself causes it, however- so far in Wolfenstein 2 at around 51fps (which is below minitors max. refresh rate which is 60) tha input lag was insane, much higher than with Dynamic Res enabled ingame and Freesync turned off in Xbox settings.
So ppl shouldnt get super excited about reduced input latency with Freesync enabled on Xbox X.
Another Test in COD WW2 with and without Freesync showed that with Freesync disabled the controller input delay was slightly more responsive as opposed to Freesync enabled, which felt a little bit less responsive.
The thing with Freesync is that it might actually force Vsync in some games that by default dont use Vsync.
As of right now I would go as far as claiming- dont enable Freesync on Xbox if you have a 60 Hz monitor. If you have a 120 Hz 1440p/1080p monitor- you can give Freesync a try, other than that it will introduce more lag.
Also according to rtings.com, who have tested several Freesync capable monitors, in their lag tests of 4K 60hz monitors theyve noticed that with Freesync enabled the overall input lag was slightly higher versus 4K 60Hz with Freesync disabled. Not by much though- usually 1-3ms higher.
In the game settings its possible to disable dynamic resolution. Then the game runs at native 4K with the framerate dropping to low 50s / high 40s.
My Asus VP28UQ which has Freesync 1 support over HDMI wirked fine with 4K @ Freesync on Xbox X. It even has an option to show framerate and it did show the framerate going to low 50s in many areas.
I went to areas with low 50fps and tested a bit- there was no stutter, game was smooth, so Freesync worked. However Ivenoticed massive input lag. Alot higher that enabling dynamic resolution ingame. Not sure if the engine itself causes it, however- so far in Wolfenstein 2 at around 51fps (which is below minitors max. refresh rate which is 60) tha input lag was insane, much higher than with Dynamic Res enabled ingame and Freesync turned off in Xbox settings.
So ppl shouldnt get super excited about reduced input latency with Freesync enabled on Xbox X.
Another Test in COD WW2 with and without Freesync showed that with Freesync disabled the controller input delay was slightly more responsive as opposed to Freesync enabled, which felt a little bit less responsive.
The thing with Freesync is that it might actually force Vsync in some games that by default dont use Vsync.
As of right now I would go as far as claiming- dont enable Freesync on Xbox if you have a 60 Hz monitor. If you have a 120 Hz 1440p/1080p monitor- you can give Freesync a try, other than that it will introduce more lag.
Also according to rtings.com, who have tested several Freesync capable monitors, in their lag tests of 4K 60hz monitors theyve noticed that with Freesync enabled the overall input lag was slightly higher versus 4K 60Hz with Freesync disabled. Not by much though- usually 1-3ms higher.
Falkentynes BenQ Service Menu thread: http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
Outch!
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
I mean its still an early implementation, we may see different results later.
The next console gen will support HDMI 2.1 by default, which goes up to 4K 120 Hz + Freesync. I expect the Freesync feature to mature by then- in 1-2 years.
Again COD ww2 runs 99% at locked 60 fps- with freesync enabled it felt just slightly less responsive, Id say 5 to max 15 ms. Not that big of a disadvantage. Cant tell if its to blame on the monitor or Freesync itself.
In Wilfenstein 2 however at 51-54 fps (4K mode, dynamic resolution OFF, freesync enabled) the input lag is alot higher than Dynamic Resolution ON (which lock the game at pretty consistent 60fps) + Freesync disabled.
The next console gen will support HDMI 2.1 by default, which goes up to 4K 120 Hz + Freesync. I expect the Freesync feature to mature by then- in 1-2 years.
Again COD ww2 runs 99% at locked 60 fps- with freesync enabled it felt just slightly less responsive, Id say 5 to max 15 ms. Not that big of a disadvantage. Cant tell if its to blame on the monitor or Freesync itself.
In Wilfenstein 2 however at 51-54 fps (4K mode, dynamic resolution OFF, freesync enabled) the input lag is alot higher than Dynamic Resolution ON (which lock the game at pretty consistent 60fps) + Freesync disabled.
Falkentynes BenQ Service Menu thread: http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
120Hz should make a big difference as GSYNC 101 recommends capping frame rates a few frames oer second below Hz.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: 120Hz reduces input lag of 30fps and 60fps!
But that will only work if games can be forced to output at 120 Hz. We know from the PC side that most games start in 60 Hz mode, then in the settings we can select 120/144 etc.
If the Xbox games ask the monitor to switch to 60 Hz, there will be zero advantages.
If the Xbox games ask the monitor to switch to 60 Hz, there will be zero advantages.
Falkentynes BenQ Service Menu thread: http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2467