jorimt wrote: ↑20 Oct 2021, 14:13
Yes, because you'll then have GtG and MPRT blur. OLED is the best sample and hold motion clarity you're going to get in the TV market right now.
Yep. The refresh rate definitely dictates the sample and hold, and OLED is the fastest-GtG sample and hold technology at these big screens, but only if LCD and OLED refresh rates are equal.
Now, this will be dethroned by the
4K 240Hz panel sampling by AUO. Even with OLED's faster pixel response time, 4K 240Hz LCD will have less sample-and-hold motion blur at 240fps 240Hz. Now, a double-Hz LCD has less motion blur than a half-Hz OLED, since the sheer doubled Hz usually outweighs the marginally slower pixel response (until you're in ~360-to-480Hz-ish territory)
It does requires strobing (like a plasma or CRT) for some LCDs to become far better than OLEDs in motion resolution.
But same Hz-for-Hz in sample and hold mode, OLEDs blow away LCDs, definitely. Exactly what you said. That's never questioned.
(Just want to point out some nuances that commonly confuse many people)
NeonPizza wrote: ↑20 Oct 2021, 14:36
But because game mode looks lousy on the C1 i'm currently using Bright ISF Expert mode....and that's about 89ms of lag. LOL i'm screwed.
I used to self-calibrate a NEC XG135 CRT projector to ISF specifications. It had 0ms signal-to-scanout latency, like any analog CRT! (I used to work in the home theater industry, and worked with video processors including RUNCO, Key Digital, etc.) I also was the former moderator of the AVSCIENCE Home Theater Computers Forums, from 1998-ish to 2001-ish.
If you like OLED BFI (impulse driven mode), then you could attempt to "downgrade" from C1 to CX OLED to get half motion blur during BFI mode (75% blur reduction relative to 60Hz). That specific model has motion very roughly competitive to plasma when interpolation is disabled and BFI is enabled in its purest mode. It does add a little latency but not nearly as much as 89ms. But unfortunately the mode is fairly dim unlike overvoltage-boosted strobe backlight modes found in certain LCD displays.
Another left-field big screen "CRT clarity" experience -- is to watch an IMAX-sized movie in BigScreen on a Quest 2 or a different high-resolution headset. It looked far better than plasma and I could scale the virtual image to about 200 inches, while I was able to look down to stare at a virtual sofa or virtual movie theater seat with cupholder, and look around the 3D rendered room the virtual 200 inch screen is in. The way 3D is done on Valve Index and Quest 2 is 100x more comfortable than Real3D or Disney3D cinema glasses, because it more 1:1 maps to human vision 3D in perfect 1:1 sync for certain VR apps. That said, the effective resolution for movie-watching or TV-watching on a big virtual screen is only about 1080p, despite Quest 2 being near-4K due to the FOV it covers and the 3D rendered room surrounding the screen you're staring at. Of all the video apps, I would avoid the Netflix app (480p) and use other apps though or simply stream your PC screen to the big virtualized VR screen, and switch refresh rate to 72Hz (for 24fps movies) and switch refresh rate to either 60Hz or 120Hz (for 60fps video) via SideQuest setting.
Now, many don't want to do that though, but it's put there for motion-resolution-videophiles like me...
Displays are inherently imperfect compromises for quite a while.