32GS95UE 480hz OLED

[petight]

LG have announced an OLED capable of doing 480hz at 1080p.
I can't paste the link, so just Google 32GS95UE.

I'm assuming this works by having each refresh use an alternating pixel, essentially overlapping two 240hz 1080p outputs. If that's the case, I'd expect this would also achieve a BFI -like increase in perceived motion clarity. Too bad it's 1080p at 32"! I also wonder if that pixel alternation would be perceptible.

[Chief Blur Buster]

I can't paste the link, so just Google 32GS95UE.

(Links are allowed by new forum members once they have a few posts)

Here's the link as a courtesy:
https://www.google.com/search?q=32GS95UE&tbm=nws

[daviddave1]

https://www.techpowerup.com/316998/asus ... 80-hz-mode

ASUS Teases 4K 240 Hz ROG Gaming Monitor with 1080p 480 Hz Mode
by TheLostSwede Today, 20:59 Discuss (1 Comment)
Just like LG and HP, ASUS is gearing up to launch a dual mode 4K 240 Hz / 1080p 480 Hz OLED monitor and the company has released a little teaser ahead of the official CES 2024 reveal of the monitor. The display will unsurprisingly fall under ASUS' ROG brand and will be known as the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDP and spec wise it appears to use the same OLED panel as LG's 32GS95UE and HP's Omen Transcend, since all three monitors feature the dual mode option of 4K 240 Hz or 1080p 480 Hz. ASUS claims that the PG32UCDP is "the world's first dual-mode gaming monitor" which we've already seen isn't the case, but it's still the matter of who will be first to offer their displays in the retail market.

Interestingly, ASUS announced the similar ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM at Gamescom 2023, which was said to offer a QD-OLED display with a 4K resolution and a 240 Hz refresh rate. The PG32UCDM appears to lack the 1080p 480 Hz mode though, but with only one letter difference in the model name, potential buyers are going to have to pay close attention so they don't end up with the wrong display. We're going to have to wait for a release and review of the displays before we'll know which one is the better of the two ASUS models.

https://youtu.be/197YOy_eYTo?si=HHoYJB9HYibhFacL

[tong]

I'm assuming this works by having each refresh use an alternating pixel, essentially overlapping two 240hz 1080p outputs. If that's the case, I'd expect this would also achieve a BFI -like increase in perceived motion clarity. Too bad it's 1080p at 32"! I also wonder if that pixel alternation would be perceptible.

Not really, most monitors are capable of overclocking to rates beyond their specs, like the Odyssey G7 reaching 480hz at lower resolutions. The issue is that the panel isnt fast enough and you get massive overshoot/ghosting artifacts and frame skipping.

With the bandwidth needed to do 4k@240hz, 1080p@480hz is trivial.

[evmadic]

I'm assuming this works by having each refresh use an alternating pixel, essentially overlapping two 240hz 1080p outputs. If that's the case, I'd expect this would also achieve a BFI -like increase in perceived motion clarity. Too bad it's 1080p at 32"! I also wonder if that pixel alternation would be perceptible.

Not really, most monitors are capable of overclocking to rates beyond their specs, like the Odyssey G7 reaching 480hz at lower resolutions. The issue is that the panel isnt fast enough and you get massive overshoot/ghosting artifacts and frame skipping.

With the bandwidth needed to do 4k@240hz, 1080p@480hz is trivial.

Displayport 2.1 anyone?

[chandler55]

woudl be my dream monitor if it wasnt for the matte

[FlyingAsianZ]

Looks like reviews are starting to come out.
Does anyone think a 1440p mode @ 360hz can be hacked into this? That'd be ideal....