I would pay a lot for a OLED GSYNC monitor

Talk about NVIDIA G-SYNC, a variable refresh rate (VRR) technology. G-SYNC eliminates stutters, tearing, and reduces input lag. List of G-SYNC Monitors.
Post Reply
Danybonin
Posts: 11
Joined: 04 Apr 2015, 12:43

I would pay a lot for a OLED GSYNC monitor

Post by Danybonin » 14 Jun 2015, 20:52

A 1440p oled gsync monitor would be great. There is a oled LG tv 55" for 3300$.

When will we see gsync oled monitor? Is oled not good for monitor cause of degradation and the fact that monitor can show same picture for a long time?

Im usually playing games in total dark, and even with brighness very low, LCD sucks so much in this area, IPS or TN or any LCD is far from oled. I would pay a lot for a oled gsync monitor, if this is ever possible.
5930k at 4.4 Ghz
Asus x99 deluxe
16GB ddr4 3000mhz
2080 ti
ssd 850 pro 512GB + 1T evo 840 + 1T pcie ssd
win 10 64bits
Asus pg27uq 4k HDR 144hz monitor
(sorry for my poor english, i speak french)

RLBURNSIDE
Posts: 104
Joined: 06 Apr 2015, 16:09

Re: I would pay a lot for a OLED GSYNC monitor

Post by RLBURNSIDE » 18 Jun 2015, 00:20

We're much more likely to get Freesync on TVs through DisplayPort 1.3 inputs, possibly running over USB 3.1 connectors.

The good news is that high end TVs, especially OLEDs, are likely to want to bypass HDMI 2.0a's 18gbps limitation so that you can feed them higher refresh rates at higher bit depths. The 4k 2015 LG OLEDs are getting HDR firmware updates through HDMI 2.0a, so that they can use a greater dynamic range at 10-bit color depth. But over HDMI 2.0a, you still can't send more than UHD @ 60hz @ 444 chroma @ 8-bits. DisplayPort 1.2a can do 10-bits, so in theory that's one way to get 444 to your OLED. But it would be better to just support DisplayPort 1.3 from the start and go up to 12-bits at 444 at 120hz.

Edmond

Re: I would pay a lot for a OLED GSYNC monitor

Post by Edmond » 18 Jun 2015, 06:07

RLBURNSIDE wrote:We're much more likely to get Freesync on TVs through DisplayPort 1.3 inputs, possibly running over USB 3.1 connectors.

The good news is that high end TVs, especially OLEDs, are likely to want to bypass HDMI 2.0a's 18gbps limitation so that you can feed them higher refresh rates at higher bit depths. The 4k 2015 LG OLEDs are getting HDR firmware updates through HDMI 2.0a, so that they can use a greater dynamic range at 10-bit color depth. But over HDMI 2.0a, you still can't send more than UHD @ 60hz @ 444 chroma @ 8-bits. DisplayPort 1.2a can do 10-bits, so in theory that's one way to get 444 to your OLED. But it would be better to just support DisplayPort 1.3 from the start and go up to 12-bits at 444 at 120hz.

I would murder for a 444, 8bit, 21:9, flicker free, 0-120hz adaptive sync OLED monitor

Danybonin
Posts: 11
Joined: 04 Apr 2015, 12:43

Re: I would pay a lot for a OLED GSYNC monitor

Post by Danybonin » 22 Jun 2015, 22:23

anything oled + gsync would be awesome!
5930k at 4.4 Ghz
Asus x99 deluxe
16GB ddr4 3000mhz
2080 ti
ssd 850 pro 512GB + 1T evo 840 + 1T pcie ssd
win 10 64bits
Asus pg27uq 4k HDR 144hz monitor
(sorry for my poor english, i speak french)

Post Reply