Logun wrote:I used both the frameskipping and framerate tests along with the RefreshRateMultitool.
I was getting 90FPS as observed by MSIAfterburning monitoring tool
The difference between 60fps and 90fps is very subtle on 5ms-and-slower LCDs (real world is more than 10ms, enough to streak the frames to obscure max possible improvement of 90hz. Much like an old 33ms LCD of over a decade ago, but at faster timescales)
Do you see a clarity difference in
http://www.testufo.com/photo?
If so, try temporarily turning VSYNC ON and use keyboard strafe left/right in front of high detail textures.
That test will bypass the mouse microstutter weak link, and the VSYNC OFF microstutter weak link.
Assuming nonstop 90fps at 90Hz with no frame slowdowns.
Difference will be more dramatic on a faster LCD, especially strobed, see comparison photos at
http://www.blurbusters.com/faq/60vs120vslb/
Newer 2013-era strobed TN is measured to have 12 times sharper motion, and the FG2421 is measured to have more than 6x sharper fast motion. IPS is good for still images but becomes disgustingly blurry VHS quality in fast motion. If you want high def CRT clarity in fast motion, you need strobed such as Lightboost, ULMB, Turbo240, etc.
SEIKI will be better but it is not strobed, so it will be only up to 2x clearer fast motion, not 12x clearer.
Persistence becomes strobe length on strobed displays, rather than refresh length. Most 2ms non strobed displays have 1/60 = 16.7ms persistence. GtG is what the manufacturer quotes, and not the important persistence value. Persistence is is explained at
http://www.testufo.com/eyetracking ..... Pixel GTG transition is not the cause of motion blur on modern LCD panels, as it is now a tiny fraction of a refresh cycle on faster panels, as explained in the educational animation.
I personally can't wait for strobed IPS or low persistence (rolling scan) desktop OLED.