Blur Busters Forums

I currently have a ViewSonic XG2431. I'm wondering exactly how clear (as in motion clarity) the image of these new Pulsar monitors are at a low fps (for example 75 Hz) compared to the XG2431. I know the strength of Pulsar is the almost negligable crosstalk, but in terms of just clarity is it ...

radeko wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 19:46

I have found interesting thing about DYAC2
Dyac2 is rolling scan BFI only at max monitor refresh rate.
Bellow it is combination rolling scan BFI+ classic whole screen BFI

Zrzut ekranu 2026-01-07 014037.png

more info here
https://jisakuhibi.jp/zowie-xl2566x-plus#index_id18

wrong

so the new pulsar monitors have the same rolling strobe like zowie and few others

i noticed that on pg248qp, 360hz looks better than 540hz in ufo test, at normal speeds, also same with zowie looks better at lower refresh rates than the 540hz maximum

it might be viable, because its LCD with true RGB stripe, whereas oled 720hz is pentile, so it looks worse by default

i remember back in the day, phone IPS lcds had the same issue, from an angle it would wash out, but phones with good lcds like htc one x, iphone 5 fixed most of the issue

i think a 1440p 24.5 inch monitor with really good backlight strobing, might be the end game monitor for me

, it doesnt even have to be 500hz+

xl2586x 540hz, at 400hz, its the best ufo i ever seen, i also have pg248qp, rolling scan is much better on zowie, even though its slightly better than 540/500hz, i would still run 540/500hz, mouse just feels better

Nah it's just a waste of money, i bet xl2566k is still better, dyac2 looks nice in a full screen crosstalk UFO tear, how noticeable in game, I can't tell