Blur Busters Forums

just a quick question, is there any downside to using ULMB2 in terms of input lag / response times?

bought the monitor this week and happy with it so far

I am a high level (gbmaster king of wellspring) diabotical player (essentially a quote clone) I replaced my 240hz ROG with this monitor recently and i'm very impressed, everything feels more real time / precise and smooth. diabotical is the only game i've tested it on - running at 400+fps consitentl...

wow, it looks so blurry in comparison to the 240hz with ulmb

I think i'll just wait until the next generation of monitors if 390hz isn't even making a difference!

surprised there's no more info on this considering its the fastest monitor around atm?

get the asus 240hz, I bought it just to play Quake
expensive but worth it, 144hz feels absolutely horrible now

Yes, try a lower resolution first (960x1024 or 1280x720). It might even lower input lag a smidgen too (less rendertime). Create this custom resolution first in a Custom Resolution Utility (NVIDIA's or ToastyX's) and then try it out. Upgrade Advice If you are an older-engine Quake or CS:GO competiti...

The incredible amount of bandwidth needed for 240Hz is over a 500Mhz dotlock! Which only works on DisplayPort -- DVI can't even do that many pixels per second. AFAIK, the GTX 680 isn't even capable of pushing that many pixels per second on any of its video outputs. (1080p 240Hz is about half a bill...

I've just bought one of these, it says 240hz is only supported on certain monitors: 745(OEM),. GeForce. GTX. 750,. GeForce. GTX. 750Ti,. GeForce. GTX. 780,. GeForce. GTX. 780Ti,. GeForce. GTX. TITAN,. GeForce. GTX. TITAN. Black,. GeForce. GTX. TITAN. Z,. GeForce. GTX. 960,. GeForce. GTX. 970,. GeFor...