Search found 4 matches

by Joker18
15 Jan 2019, 16:37
Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
Topic: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster based)
Replies: 174
Views: 249187

Re: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster base

Vsync On (NVcpl) + Frame cap 0,01 below RTTS
92.4ms / 109.2ms / 88.2ms / 92.4ms / 105ms / 88.2ms
~95,9ms
That's very new!

Once upon a time, NVCPL was laggier than RTSS. But now it beats RTSS?

Time for a big retest of the framerate cappers!


I this instance only Vsync was enabled in NVCpl ...
by Joker18
15 Jan 2019, 15:21
Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
Topic: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster based)
Replies: 174
Views: 249187

Re: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster base

As far as I know RTTS limiter ads a bit of inputlag compared to ingame limiter and this is one of the reasons it can achieve a much smoother experience.

Battle(non)sense also found a small difference between ingame limiter and RTTS https://youtu.be/rs0PYCpBJjc?t=244
by Joker18
15 Jan 2019, 09:04
Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
Topic: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster based)
Replies: 174
Views: 249187

Re: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster base

I written the data only for 6 measurements for each, you have the values there.
Where I had more variation I checked aditional instances to see if there was an anomaly or not, but i found that the aditional measurements fall in the same interval so I left them out to have an even no.
by Joker18
15 Jan 2019, 04:48
Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
Topic: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster based)
Replies: 174
Views: 249187

Re: RTSS now has new automatic Low-Lag VSYNC ON (raster base

Hi Guys,
As I couldn't find the answers I was looking for anywhere I decided to make my own tests of inputlag with different Sync Options.
I would like to share my results with you, perhaps this info will be useful to other people.

Vsync Off RTTS off
79,8 ms / 96.6 ms / 75.6 ms / 67.2 ms / 92.4 ...