Blur Busters Forums

same issue for me. wondering about this. Latency is identical.

Thanks a lot for the detailed response. BF V actually feels a lot smoother to me when I use RTSS to cap fps, which gives me a consistent frame time of 7.2ms. It stays at that even with a lot of action, whereas the in-game limiter will result in frame time spikes to ~11ms and things start to feel slu...

The weirdest thing: I have to constantly switched between disable and enable fullscreen optimizations for it to be input lag "free".

In the G-SYNC 101: External FPS Limiter article, it says that it's best to use an in-game FPS limiter if that option exists. However, in a few games (e.g. BF V), the in-game limiter (144fps) causes frame time to fluctuate by quite a bit. E.g. 5ms to 10+ms. This also occurs when I use in-game command...

Bishi wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2019, 13:54

This game has input lag for me unless I disable fullscreen optimisations (right click exe)

I still get input lag with FSO disabled. I think the game just doesn't handle full screen well.

Thanks, that makes more sense.

If you constantly push 139 fps and cap frames does it still make sense to use gsync on, vsync on in that scenario. There is no VRR here, right since you're always at 139 fps?

Thanks, I will continue to keep using GSYNC ON, VSYNC ON + Frame-rate cap.
Love the site!

Hello all, Long time lurker, finally signed up. As the question states in the subject, should Gsync be ON or OFF when FPS==monitor refresh rate? To my understanding, there is no benefit to having Gsync on in that scenario, and it could be better to use ULMB in that case. Is there an input lag penalt...