Blur Busters Forums

I'm not saying they are all cheaters. As do0om points out, there are players who have achieved it, including himself. A 160 ms population average can achieve 150 ms over five trials without much difficulty. The point is, if you know that the pool is tainted by cheaters up to 150 ms, it cannot be us...

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. I'll reply in detail soon, but am out of time for the next 16 hours or so.

the human benchmark reaction time test The 150 ms results in their database are from cheating/guessing, there's no point in referencing them. Here's the quote from my article: If you look at the distribution, you can see that some people are performing at around 150 ms. These are probably younger f...

Broom, in the link you provided, I don't see any difference between CSGO and CS 1.6 - both show an input lag of ~2 ms when framerate is uncapped.

so you need 5 posts for PM access. You're just one away

lol haven't checked this thread in a while if i forget about this, pm spacediver and he can email me :P :) So it's been almost a month. I couldn't catch flood online in Steam since he added me. Spacediver, could you email flood for me, please? It would be nice to have a free rig for tests :D And co...

I'm not sure what's going on. This is one area of CRT operation that I used to know more about, and I was never that familiar with interlaced stuff to begin with.

It sounds like you're getting true 160 hz though (i.e. each field is being refreshed at 1/160th of a second).

According to the specs you linked to, the max vertical scanning rate is 110 hz (and according to cnet, it's 120 hz). I don't think running in interlaced mode magically allows you to double this. The circuit that controls the vertical scanning is limited in how often it can direct the beam up and dow...