Z690 usb/timer issue

[pox02]

https://www.ti.com/tool/USB-REDRIVER-EVM

phpBB [video]

[Slender]

ok, I can say that these parameters can affect something.

Legacy IO Low Latency | VarStore: PchSetup, VarOffset: 0x771, Size: 0x1
Disabled: 0x0 (default)
Enabled: 0x1

USB 2.0 Controller Mode | VarStore: UsbSupport, VarOffset: 0x2E, Size: 0x1
HiSpeed: 0x1 (default)
FullSpeed: 0x0

System Time and Alarm Source | VarStore: Setup, VarOffset: 0x873, Size: 0x1
ACPI Time and Alarm Device: 0x0 (default)
Legacy RTC: 0x1

FIVR Spread Spectrum | VarStore: CpuSetup, VarOffset: 0x2F7, Size: 0x1
Disabled: 0x0
Enabled: 0x1 (default)

FCLK Frequency for Early Power On | VarStore: CpuSetup, VarOffset: 0x127, Size: 0x1
Normal (800Mhz): 0x0
1GHz: 0x1
400MHz: 0x2
Auto: 0x3 (default)

[Slender]

as you can see, on my external controller, my mouse works on usb 1.1 and the port it is connected to also works on 1.1
But when I insert the mouse into the usb 2.0 port on the motherboard (after disabling high speed in the bios), nothing changes, the port still works in highspeed mode (at least that's what the program says, I don't know how to check in fact)

[Eonds]

as you can see, on my external controller, my mouse works on usb 1.1 and the port it is connected to also works on 1.1
But when I insert the mouse into the usb 2.0 port on the motherboard (after disabling high speed in the bios), nothing changes, the port still works in highspeed mode (at least that's what the program says, I don't know how to check in fact)

High speed allows to the usb controller to operate faster. It's related to bandwidth.

[Slender]

as you can see, on my external controller, my mouse works on usb 1.1 and the port it is connected to also works on 1.1
But when I insert the mouse into the usb 2.0 port on the motherboard (after disabling high speed in the bios), nothing changes, the port still works in highspeed mode (at least that's what the program says, I don't know how to check in fact)

High speed allows to the usb controller to operate faster. It's related to bandwidth.

yes, but this causes some inconsistency, because the mouse is running at full speed, in other words, our mice do not need high bandwidth

[Slender]

as if it repeats itself

[kriegor]

My graph looks clean with <1ms variance when I just booted windows.
It looks the same as yours with +40/-40 when I have apps running, without any affinities. It may simply be the architecture.
Z390 graphs also looks way worse when you have all the standard apps running.
But can you describe to me what exactly that polling graph is supposed to be indicative off?
Your mouse inputs are processed differently when you are on a desktop composition versus inside a fullscreen render (game).

ok, I can say that these parameters can affect something.

And I can say with certainty that you can not possibly make it more obvious you have no idea what you are doing or talking about.

[Slender]

My graph looks clean with <1ms variance when I just booted windows.
It looks the same as yours with +40/-40 when I have apps running, without any affinities. It may simply be the architecture.
Z390 graphs also looks way worse when you have all the standard apps running.
But can you describe to me what exactly that polling graph is supposed to be indicative off?
Your mouse inputs are processed differently when you are on a desktop composition versus inside a fullscreen render (game).

ok, I can say that these parameters can affect something.

And I can say with certainty that you can not possibly make it more obvious you have no idea what you are doing or talking about.

for heavy games delta 980-1020, for like cs 990-1010.
This is the only program that tells me what is wrong in the system.
And yes, I really can't say anything about these hidden settings in the bios.

[Eonds]

as if it repeats itself

What mouse are you using in those tests?

[Slender]

as if it repeats itself

What mouse are you using in those tests?

xm1r, pulsar xlite, viper 8khz (1000hz)

I have 12700kf and 3070ti now, test it next day