Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
I've tested CS:GO on both Intel and AMD and there is a difference, indeed, but rather in mouse movement itself than in input-lag. It was more like comparing mice with different sensors.
On my Ryzen system I had to mod BIOS file to change some settings which are unavailable (not shown) by default. For example, when I have "XHCI Gen1" and "XHCI Gen2" both on "Auto" (which usually means "Enabled") my mouse movement feels like shit, but when I force one of them to disabled -- mouse movement immediately becomes a lot better. Also there are some hidden power-saving options turned on by default (on overclocker's motheboard, wtf?) like "Chipset Power Saving Features", "C1E Support", "PCIe Speed Power Policy", "C6 Mode" and so on.
On my Ryzen system I had to mod BIOS file to change some settings which are unavailable (not shown) by default. For example, when I have "XHCI Gen1" and "XHCI Gen2" both on "Auto" (which usually means "Enabled") my mouse movement feels like shit, but when I force one of them to disabled -- mouse movement immediately becomes a lot better. Also there are some hidden power-saving options turned on by default (on overclocker's motheboard, wtf?) like "Chipset Power Saving Features", "C1E Support", "PCIe Speed Power Policy", "C6 Mode" and so on.
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
Any idea where I could learn how to mod my bios? I have the MSI B450 Gaming Plus which doesn't really feature many settings.ffs_ wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 01:43I've tested CS:GO on both Intel and AMD and there is a difference, indeed, but rather in mouse movement itself than in input-lag. It was more like comparing mice with different sensors.
On my Ryzen system I had to mod BIOS file to change some settings which are unavailable (not shown) by default. For example, when I have "XHCI Gen1" and "XHCI Gen2" both on "Auto" (which usually means "Enabled") my mouse movement feels like shit, but when I force one of them to disabled -- mouse movement immediately becomes a lot better. Also there are some hidden power-saving options turned on by default (on overclocker's motheboard, wtf?) like "Chipset Power Saving Features", "C1E Support", "PCIe Speed Power Policy", "C6 Mode" and so on.
- MaxTendency
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 22 Jun 2020, 01:47
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
It's certain that AMD has higher input delay than Intel. In the video amd has 18% higher delay in fortnite (18.3/15.5) and 34% higher in csgo (16.3/12.2). However im not sure how reliable those tests are.
Firstly, as alot of people already pointed out, mobos usually have lots of power saving options enabled and hidden. You need a custom bios to disable them. So we don't know which mobo had more power saving which had less in those tests.
Secondly, he caps the fps. Which makes sense since he doesn't want to include input delay reduction from higher fps. However higher fps (in lower/competitive settings) is a big selling point for intel. So i feel its unfair that he didn't include uncapped results.
Thirdly, pairing a 10900k with 3600mhz cl16 is kinda dumb. On ryzen it makes sense since if you go above 3766 mhz (i believe) you suffer from a massive memory latency penalty. A more realistic situation would be 10900k+4400mhz cl19. Not to mention that if u manually tune the timings u can get 35ns memory latency quite easily on an intel rig and I've seen a fair amount of 31-32ns as well. However I've never seen amd system go below 60ns (usually its above 70ns).
It should be worth mentioning that amd 4000 series looks better than 3000 series in terms of memory latency, but its still nowhere near what you can get from an Intel rig.
The source are linked in the images themselves, click on them to visit.
Last edited by MaxTendency on 24 Jul 2020, 19:01, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
Has someone done a test of memory speed / memory latency and input lag?
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
Would you elaborate? I use 3866 CL16 with Ryzen 3600x, perhaps I should switch to 3733, hmm...MaxTendency wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 18:07On ryzen it makes sense since if you go above 3766 mhz (i believe) you suffer from a massive memory latency penalty.
Yes, though ~65 ns would be not too hard to achieve with good memory.MaxTendency wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 18:07However I've never seen amd system go below 60ns (usually its above 70ns).
I think it's mostly because 4333 CL14 have been used, although L1 cache speed was increased by ~25% as well.MaxTendency wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 18:07It should be worth mentioning that amd 4000 series looks better than 3000 series in terms of memory latency
Last edited by ffs_ on 25 Jul 2020, 14:16, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
I've just noticed that 4000 series CPU from the screenshot you posted is Renoir, i.e. APU based on Zen 2, not Zen 3.MaxTendency wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 18:07It should be worth mentioning that amd 4000 series looks better than 3000 series in terms of memory latency
- MaxTendency
- Posts: 59
- Joined: 22 Jun 2020, 01:47
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
Above 3733mhz the MCLK and FCLK de-synchronizes into a 2:1 ratio causing memory latency to go up.
That's true, however unlike the 3000 series, Renoir is a monolithic cpu not a chiplet. I don't think I've seen any zen 3 benchmarks yet.
65ns is doable. Still far from Intel.
I don't think its the memory frequency but rather the fact that MCLK and FCLK are synchronized in a 1:1 ratio that's causing the lower memory latency.
Re: Is it true Ryzen has higher input lag than Intel? Is there conclusive data to prove this?
This is silicon lottery. You can use 1:1 with any IF frequency, but most CPUs will run at 1866, some at 1900 and only few at 1933.MaxTendency wrote: ↑25 Jul 2020, 20:18Above 3733mhz the MCLK and FCLK de-synchronizes into a 2:1 ratio causing memory latency to go up.
3300X is also monolithic, but latency difference is probably 4-5 ns (lower). I think it's about architecture itself since Zen 2 has high latency (higher than Zen+, for example). Perhaps we will see memory improvements/optimizations in Zen 3 so it could benefit from using monolithic format.MaxTendency wrote: ↑25 Jul 2020, 20:18That's true, however unlike the 3000 series, Renoir is a monolithic cpu not a chiplet.
I still doubt you will get such result with 4333 CL19 even at 1:1.MaxTendency wrote: ↑25 Jul 2020, 20:18I don't think its the memory frequency but rather the fact that MCLK and FCLK are synchronized in a 1:1 ratio that's causing the lower memory latency.