hey folks,
maybe its a dumb question, i dont know but i was asking myself.
its possible to coop 2 internet connections together through a special router, I was wondering if this would in any way increase the game performance ? Does this make sense? or is it rather useless?
Would 2 ISP connections increasing the gaming performance ?
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: 11 Mar 2021, 06:06
Re: Would 2 ISP connections increasing the gaming performance ?
even if u will connect 2 isp to a router it will use only one specific isp so its uselessUnreazz wrote: ↑15 Jun 2021, 08:58hey folks,
maybe its a dumb question, i dont know but i was asking myself.
its possible to coop 2 internet connections together through a special router, I was wondering if this would in any way increase the game performance ? Does this make sense? or is it rather useless?
Re: Would 2 ISP connections increasing the gaming performance ?
This is called bonding, and I happen to use that. Not 2 different ISPs, but two different internet connections from the same ISP. The benefit is more bandwidth, which translates to higher download and upload speeds. However, this does not decrease the network latency. It's the same at best, but can be worse.Unreazz wrote: ↑15 Jun 2021, 08:58hey folks,
maybe its a dumb question, i dont know but i was asking myself.
its possible to coop 2 internet connections together through a special router, I was wondering if this would in any way increase the game performance ? Does this make sense? or is it rather useless?
So, no. It does not improve gaming, since network latency is the important factor here. It only improves download/upload speed.
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Re: Would 2 ISP connections increasing the gaming performance ?
It is very easy to combine 2 or more different isp and balance the load.RealNC wrote: ↑21 Jun 2021, 01:21This is called bonding, and I happen to use that. Not 2 different ISPs, but two different internet connections from the same ISP. The benefit is more bandwidth, which translates to higher download and upload speeds. However, this does not decrease the network latency. It's the same at best, but can be worse.Unreazz wrote: ↑15 Jun 2021, 08:58hey folks,
maybe its a dumb question, i dont know but i was asking myself.
its possible to coop 2 internet connections together through a special router, I was wondering if this would in any way increase the game performance ? Does this make sense? or is it rather useless?
So, no. It does not improve gaming, since network latency is the important factor here. It only improves download/upload speed.
Concerning the benefits for games.
Having several isp, you can choose the route with the lowest ping, with the help of a set of routing rules and the netwatch tool, you can automate the selection.
In the event of an accident with one provider, automatic switching to another provider.
The summation of speeds occurs only for multi connections.
I often do not clearly state my thoughts. google translate is far from perfect. And in addition to the translator, I myself am mistaken. Do not take me seriously.
Re: Would 2 ISP connections increasing the gaming performance ?
Totally depends on the quality line of your connection and what routes your ISP is using (There's something like cheap routes depending on the ISP).
I have multiple average connections here (Or intermittent) and I use a redundant line to a self-owned VPS in the cloud to bond two (or more) connections together over a Wireguard UDP tunnel. (Not load balancing, but mirroring operation / packet duplication)
Basically this means that if one line drops packets (or has latency spikes) the other line still successfully sends packets back and forth.
The worst thing that could happen is udp packet out of order delivery but practically this is a non issue. (Could even compensate for this with a small buffer on interfaces or something)
(My method is similar to Speedify redundant mode but I'm not dependent on this cloud service and my setup is more reliable)
I have multiple average connections here (Or intermittent) and I use a redundant line to a self-owned VPS in the cloud to bond two (or more) connections together over a Wireguard UDP tunnel. (Not load balancing, but mirroring operation / packet duplication)
Basically this means that if one line drops packets (or has latency spikes) the other line still successfully sends packets back and forth.
The worst thing that could happen is udp packet out of order delivery but practically this is a non issue. (Could even compensate for this with a small buffer on interfaces or something)
(My method is similar to Speedify redundant mode but I'm not dependent on this cloud service and my setup is more reliable)
LTSC 21H2 Post-install Script
https://github.com/Marctraider/LiveScript-LTSC-21H2
System: MSI Z390 MEG Ace - 2080 Super (300W mod) - 9900K 5GHz Fixed Core (De-lid) - 32GB DDR3-3733-CL18 - Xonar Essence STX II
https://github.com/Marctraider/LiveScript-LTSC-21H2
System: MSI Z390 MEG Ace - 2080 Super (300W mod) - 9900K 5GHz Fixed Core (De-lid) - 32GB DDR3-3733-CL18 - Xonar Essence STX II