I'm gonna to compare Asus PG278Q, X-Star DP2414LED (at 144Hz and 201Hz) and some random 60Hz monitor by slow motion records via Nikon 1 J1.
Gonna compare response/overdrive & input lag. That camera captures 640x240@400fps or 1200fps@320x120.
Just did draft capture with some random 60Hz monitor (Acer G246HYL BMJJ e-IPS response time 6ms)
testufo: http://testufo.com/#test=ghosting&backg ... &pursuit=0
youtube: https://youtu.be/_iFOQVS5gik
original video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B51F7p ... sp=sharing
For 144Hz I need may be some higher test speed and higher UFO separation.
Any recommendations how to do it much better? Lens is 10-30mm
Compare monitors by slow motion camera
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 14 Mar 2015, 00:03
Re: Compare monitors by slow motion camera
Very cool! I'd definitely be interested in more of these. Perhaps show the entire monitor as well during a portion of the test, so that individual updates will be more apparent, and scan out behavior can be observed, which would be helpful information for monitors with low-persistence (strobed backlight) modes.
Re: Compare monitors by slow motion camera
test#2
X-Star DP2414LED 144Hz (without any overdrive options)
Asus PG278Q 144Hz (overdrive extreme)
Overdrive by Asus PG278Q is better.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGjbPNLw6Jo
http://i.imgur.com/gDiEmfe.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/3KWICJP.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/bWRbNj6.jpg
X-Star DP2414LED 144Hz (without any overdrive options)
Asus PG278Q 144Hz (overdrive extreme)
Overdrive by Asus PG278Q is better.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGjbPNLw6Jo
http://i.imgur.com/gDiEmfe.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/3KWICJP.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/bWRbNj6.jpg
Re: Compare monitors by slow motion camera
test#3
reduced playback rate from 30 to 10 fps
X-Star DP2414LED 200Hz overclocked (without any overdrive options)
Asus PG278Q 144Hz (overdrive extreme)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7NnK7Em4dc
Hard to say but seems like Asus PG278Q better because it's sharper (by video and feels by game).
test#4
X-Star DP2414LED 200Hz overclocked
X-Star DP2414LED 144Hz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vQOHHsQcBA
200Hz is better here even there is a bit of picture degradation @200Hz.
reduced playback rate from 30 to 10 fps
X-Star DP2414LED 200Hz overclocked (without any overdrive options)
Asus PG278Q 144Hz (overdrive extreme)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7NnK7Em4dc
Hard to say but seems like Asus PG278Q better because it's sharper (by video and feels by game).
test#4
X-Star DP2414LED 200Hz overclocked
X-Star DP2414LED 144Hz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vQOHHsQcBA
200Hz is better here even there is a bit of picture degradation @200Hz.
-
- Posts: 505
- Joined: 18 Dec 2013, 23:51
Re: Compare monitors by slow motion camera
very nice stuff! I have a 1000 fps camera, if I get time I'll record what my FW900 CRT looks like.