New Zowie Monitor 540Hz XL2586X

[Grasshopper85]

Dyac2 is not compatible with Gsync. Pulsar is. Maybe it doesnt take a big hit on brightness also

Ok dyac2 is not compatible with gsync.

But why does a very competitive gamer need to worry about gsync?

Don't very high end competitive gamers only care about maximum fps, way higher than what the monitor can display, hence wouldn't gsync be irrelevant in that scenario?

Furthermore, wouldn't a very competitive gamer also want least latency, doesn't gsync add slight latency?

So I don't understand how the pulsar tech will be relevant when targeted at the competitive gamer? Or am I missing something?

[daviddave1]

Dyac2 is not compatible with Gsync. Pulsar is. Maybe it doesnt take a big hit on brightness also

Ok dyac2 is not compatible with gsync.

But why does a very competitive gamer need to worry about gsync?

Don't very high end competitive gamers only care about maximum fps, way higher than what the monitor can display, hence wouldn't gsync be irrelevant in that scenario?

Furthermore, wouldn't a very competitive gamer also want least latency, doesn't gsync add slight latency?

So I don't understand how the pulsar tech will be relevant when targeted at the competitive gamer? Or am I missing something?

Visibility is nr1 is games like PUBG. Gsync helps in smoothen out the image so enemy's cannot hide ( intentional or not) in the ripples on the screen. We have to see if Pulsar ads latency and if it can manage to activate it sub max 360hz/fps. Or to what degree in fights where frame drops can accure. The gassmaskguy video on the pg27aqnr site looks pretty sick. Could be marketing ofc.

[kyube]

I am actually considering the PG27AQDP now.

From what I can see and in the reviews, the 480Hz Oled seems to be very close to motion clarity of the 540hz TN.

LOL i just can't make up my mind.

I can't get both to try because in Australia we cannot return opened electronic goods.

OLED is faster, there's no debate to it.
Better contrast, better overall input lag (100% compliance = every transition is sub 2ms)
Only downside of OLED are DSC, subpixel layout, display scan-out brightness flicker (issue for some)

Here's the proof.

[daviddave1]

I am actually considering the PG27AQDP now.

From what I can see and in the reviews, the 480Hz Oled seems to be very close to motion clarity of the 540hz TN.

LOL i just can't make up my mind.

I can't get both to try because in Australia we cannot return opened electronic goods.

OLED is faster, there's no debate to it.
Better contrast, better overall input lag (100% compliance = every transition is sub 2ms)
Only downside of OLED are DSC, subpixel layout, display scan-out brightness flicker (issue for some)

Here's the proof.

Your source shows the tn with blurred white dots thats a tn withouth strobe-based blur reduction. Where does it say it has DYAC2 or ULMB2 on?
It's a fact that TN with strobe-based blur reduction (e.g. ULMB, LightBoost, DyAc, etc) gives a more clear image then monitors that are based on framerate-based blur reduction ( like OLEDS). source https://x.com/BlurBusters/status/181218 ... 13/photo/1

OLEDs are better for framerate-based blur reduction then TN panels no one denies that here ( plus oled is faster). It becomes a different story when u activate strobe-based blur reduction on a tn. Then it beats the framerate-based blur reduction of a OLED.
+
The xl2586x is a contrast machine. e-v-e-r-y --- s-i-n-g-l-e option the xl2586x has is there to create a contrast between the enemy and its surroundings including DYAC2. OLED monitors are not build that way. Sure its faster and it looks very clean like the game is intended to be seen. its just not a monitor to boost the contrast of enemies by a-n-y m-e-a-n-s necessary.

[Grasshopper85]

I find it strange that a TN panel is declared by you a contrast machine in terms of sniffing out enemies on screen, when OLEDs have infinite contrast and should there for be able to achieve this better.

Im not saying I don't believe you that the TN esports gaming panel is designed to do this for competative aspects, I just wish OLED manufacturers would offer options to be able to do the same!