For competitive high fps gaming, do you expect the 1440p 240Hz OLED to edge out even the better 360Hz LCDs like the PG27AQN? Last time I checked the PG27AQN is out of stock anyway for the moment so I'm anxiously waiting for 240Hz OLED reviews to come and will grab either one of the two. I've been using OLEDs for TV since the C8 and now C1 so excited to see monitor OLED options coming. I know it's not a monitor, but I've watched probably thousands of hours worth of gaming on each panel and haven't seen any burn in. The C1 has ~3,000 hours and the C8 is over ~5500.Chief Blur Buster wrote: ↑14 Dec 2022, 01:13There are two ways to reduce motion blur:
1. Strobe-based motion blur reduction. (XG2431 is superior)
2. Brute framerate-based motion blur reduction. (OLED is superior)
If you like strobing (the art of flickering a backlight to reduce display motion blur), XG2431 is hard to beat for its high configurability.
If you like maximum motion blur reduction without strobing, a 240Hz OLED will easily beat a 360Hz LCD (strobing=off). I'd daresay it will even beat a 500Hz IPS LCD. If you like ergonomic strobeless PWM-free motion blur reduction, I haven't seen anything better than an OLED. It's also very hard to get 400-nit strobing with most LCDs too, so retaining all of OLED's brightness capability...
OLEDs follows Blur Busters Law virtually perfectly, thanks to their near-zero GtG, and the only blur seen is MPRT blur, rather than GtG and MPRT blur combined.
Long term, low-persistence via sample and hold is the Holy Grail. But it definitely does require very high frame rates. Halving strobed motion blur is simply halving a pulse width, but halving unstrobed motion blur requires double frame rate at double Hz.
Like others I was concerned about the 200 cd/m² brightness but I checked tftcentral's measurements on my current monitor that has been plenty bright for years now and the setting I have it at outputs 223.86 cd/m² (ASUS MG279Q at 60 setting), so not too much of a difference.