Post
by jorimt » 27 Jan 2022, 10:02
jasswolf wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 22:58
I mean given the reduction in light diffusion through the improved design, wouldn't 200-220 nits SDR deliver a great basic BFI result for most use cases?
Hopefully. We won't know until they're released and tested.
jasswolf wrote: ↑26 Jan 2022, 22:58
SDR is mastered for 100 nits.
Indeed, and that's what I calibrate all my displays to, but the average gamer is used to viewing SDR in 200 nits, 300 nits, 400 nits, etc.
I'd be happy with a low duty cycle BFI that reaches 100 nits, and it's possible QD-OLED models could reach this. I'm just saying we already have excellent ~100 nits and sub-100nits strobing on Blur Buster approved displays, and the average gamer doesn't consider it bright enough, so if they want meaningful 200+ strobing on QD-OLED, they should temper their expectations.
For instance, my LG CX OLED with the highest BFI setting engaged can only reach 24 nits full field at 60Hz, and 60 nits full field at 120Hz. And even with that, I think MPRT is still a relatively high 4ms:
viewtopic.php?p=54466#p54466
(jorimt: /jor-uhm-tee/)
Author: Blur Busters "G-SYNC 101" Series
Displays: ASUS PG27AQN, LG 48CX VR: Beyond, Quest 3, Reverb G2, Index OS: Windows 11 Pro Case: Fractal Design Torrent PSU: Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 MB: ASUS Z790 Hero CPU: Intel i9-13900k w/Noctua NH-U12A GPU: GIGABYTE RTX 4090 GAMING OC RAM: 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 DDR5 6400MHz CL32 SSDs: 2TB WD_BLACK SN850 (OS), 4TB WD_BLACK SN850X (Games) Keyboards: Wooting 60HE, Logitech G915 TKL Mice: Razer Viper Mini SE, Razer Viper 8kHz Sound: Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2 (speakers/amp/DAC), AFUL Performer 8 (IEMs)