You're confusing response time and input lag. Response time is pixel transition speed; speed at which pixels change colour. This more so affects perceived motion blur.Fabulist wrote:Can someone explain how does the Omen have lower input lag although it states 1ms GtG while the Nitro has slightly higher input lag with 0.3ms GtG?
What about the XN253QX and KD25F that they state 0.4/0.5ms respectively, is this not the case? I also see that @ tomshardware reviews the Omen has lower input lag than the KD25F.
What am I missing here?
The XF252Q could have higher signal processing delay. Or, more likely, the variance between measurement methods as well as the inaccuracy of the methods used could have resulted in the XF252Q appearing to have higher input lag due to margin of error. Both monitors probably have a minimal amount of signal processing delay.