More frequency is allways welcome, but 360Hz is crazy fast, much more than some players think, much more than current GtG can take full advantage. GtG bottleneck is the "brake" than cause not enjoy "True" 360Hz experience. I think the priority of players right now, would be claim panel manufacturers a new technology capable of improve GtG to a level where only is needed a small fraction of refresh cicle to reach 100% stable color target.
Even on this amazing last generation IPS gaming LCD, response time is far away of take full advantage of 360Hz. Not only can't fit inside refresh cicle, continually surpasses it. There are one refresh cicle each 2.77ms, but PG259QN raw speed, 100% overdrive artifacts free, the fastest total response time is 5.4ms (40-0), this is almost double than the refresh cicle.
During all refresh cicle time, pixels are transitioning from one color to another, a non stop blurryness. Only can reach target color if two cicles draw the same color, and this is in the best cases, going to black. In the worst case 13.7ms (0-40), is needed almost 5 refresh cicles.
Non-strobed (blurryness, ghosting, smearing) and strobed (crosstalk, input lag) can't be fixed if the bottleneck is not solved. Currently there are techs than can do it ? Yes
1) Blue Phase LCD claim under milisecond GtG. Research state.
2) OLED. LG TV is in stores. LG monitor announced at CES 2021. Steady 1 milisecond except going from 0 to X, because ramp-up from Off state to On, takes much more than GtG, and add overshoot, at least in this panel.
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/lg/48-cx-oled
9ms spikes in theory can be solved setting RGB 0-0-0 to show 1-1-1, assuming no true black.
Burn-in phantom is around ! What you prefer for your 360+Hz monitor: OLED GtG-100% (0.9-1.3) with bunr-in risk, or LCD GtG-100% (5.4-13.7) ?
If we not have the OLED 360+Hz to compare it, see image quality, motion handling, burn-in wear speed along time, where blind to take this decission.
3) MicroLED, in stores this year in the high end TV market. Claim under microsecond GtG. Not have the OLED burn-in issue. Ramp-up ? Specs optimal for eSports.
OLED to desktop has the Burn-in phantom, but MicroLED not, this should result in a expensive monitor if is released before mass production. But no other drawbacks to use this tech for Desktop when pixels size is enought small for 24.5" FHD. With mass production prices go down fast. I remenber the first 110" Samsung LCD TV, at release cost 150K USD, the same of current MicroLED 110"
If people
massively claim its interested, but only at decent price of course, maybe result in accelerated mass production development.
https://www.androidauthority.com/micro- ... ed-805148/
OLED panels already boasts very high response times in the µs (microsecond) range. However, MicroLED can reduce this down into ns (nanoseconds) or a thousand times faster.
Imagine your 360+Hz eSports monitor with one of these steady sub-milisecond GtG-100% techs. They can jump to 1000Hz and still are inside refresh cicle. Is mandatory for eSports !