Blur Busters / TestUFO cited by more than 2 dozen peer reviewed research papers
Posted: 07 Oct 2020, 01:55
Hello all readers,
I did some recent searches for whatever researchers has cited Blur Busters / TestuFO as part of their research:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=e ... o%22&btnG=
Apparently, my creations (Blur Busters, TestUFO) have now cited in more than 2 dozen researcher papers now. That's more than I expected.
Just recently in September 2020, an example is this SID.org paper by Samsung researchers citing my Making Of: Why Are TestUFO Display Motion Tests 960 Pixels Per Second?, in the Citations section.
Blur Busters continues to trailblaze as a researcher idea factory! For good reason... I keep opening many "temporal pandora boxes" (Hz, framerate, GtG, MPRT, latency, stutter, jitter, etc) that many scientists/engineers/researchers did not quite realize were worthy until more recently.
I did some recent searches for whatever researchers has cited Blur Busters / TestuFO as part of their research:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=e ... o%22&btnG=
Apparently, my creations (Blur Busters, TestUFO) have now cited in more than 2 dozen researcher papers now. That's more than I expected.
Just recently in September 2020, an example is this SID.org paper by Samsung researchers citing my Making Of: Why Are TestUFO Display Motion Tests 960 Pixels Per Second?, in the Citations section.
Blur Busters continues to trailblaze as a researcher idea factory! For good reason... I keep opening many "temporal pandora boxes" (Hz, framerate, GtG, MPRT, latency, stutter, jitter, etc) that many scientists/engineers/researchers did not quite realize were worthy until more recently.