Just wonder.. I saw some posts online and people either say they went back to their 144hz monitor
Or they change the refresh rate to 144hz on their 240hz monitors
Is there a truth behind it?
Why some people still prefer 144hz?
Re: Why some people still prefer 144hz?
A 240Hz refresh rate doesn't automatically mean lower display processing latency or better overdrive performance; the majority of first-gen 240Hz panels were worse in this respect than equivalent 144Hz panels due to the fact that the same or similar panels were pushed to a much higher refresh rate without a proportionate decrease in native GtG. I.E. the panels couldn't keep up with the refresh rate increase.
That said, many of the newest 240Hz panels have caught up and are now equal or superior to their 144Hz counterparts where overdrive performance and display processing are concerned.
(jorimt: /jor-uhm-tee/)
Author: Blur Busters "G-SYNC 101" Series
Displays: ASUS PG27AQN, LG 48CX VR: Beyond, Quest 3, Reverb G2, Index OS: Windows 11 Pro Case: Fractal Design Torrent PSU: Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 MB: ASUS Z790 Hero CPU: Intel i9-13900k w/Noctua NH-U12A GPU: GIGABYTE RTX 4090 GAMING OC RAM: 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 DDR5 6400MHz CL32 SSDs: 2TB WD_BLACK SN850 (OS), 4TB WD_BLACK SN850X (Games) Keyboards: Wooting 60HE, Logitech G915 TKL Mice: Razer Viper Mini SE, Razer Viper 8kHz Sound: Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2 (speakers/amp/DAC), AFUL Performer 8 (IEMs)
Author: Blur Busters "G-SYNC 101" Series
Displays: ASUS PG27AQN, LG 48CX VR: Beyond, Quest 3, Reverb G2, Index OS: Windows 11 Pro Case: Fractal Design Torrent PSU: Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 MB: ASUS Z790 Hero CPU: Intel i9-13900k w/Noctua NH-U12A GPU: GIGABYTE RTX 4090 GAMING OC RAM: 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 DDR5 6400MHz CL32 SSDs: 2TB WD_BLACK SN850 (OS), 4TB WD_BLACK SN850X (Games) Keyboards: Wooting 60HE, Logitech G915 TKL Mice: Razer Viper Mini SE, Razer Viper 8kHz Sound: Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2 (speakers/amp/DAC), AFUL Performer 8 (IEMs)
Re: Why some people still prefer 144hz?
Nice thanks for the detailed postjorimt wrote: ↑20 Jan 2022, 09:17A 240Hz refresh rate doesn't automatically mean lower display processing latency or better overdrive performance; the majority of first-gen 240Hz panels were worse in this respect than equivalent 144Hz panels due to the fact that the same or similar panels were pushed to a much higher refresh rate without a proportionate decrease in native GtG. I.E. the panels couldn't keep up with the refresh rate increase.
That said, many of the newest 240Hz panels have caught up and are now equal or superior to their 144Hz counterparts where overdrive performance and display processing are concerned.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 30 Jul 2020, 19:01
Re: Why some people still prefer 144hz?
because haven't they tried decent 240hz