Page 2 of 2
Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection
Posted: 21 Jul 2022, 23:43
by Anonymous316387
Discorz wrote: ↑29 Apr 2022, 02:32
Glad you guys liked it. Let me know if u have any suggestions for improvement.
Hi, very great job.
Can you please add the XG27AQM ?
Same panel as PG279QM without G-sync module.
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection
Posted: 20 Sep 2022, 06:17
by Discorz
Anonymous316387 wrote: ↑21 Jul 2022, 23:43
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Sorry for late reply...
Bijan takes his pursuits at 1920pps moving speed, default is 960pps. Faster speeds will naturally look blurrier. Links with speeds that are not 960 are marked
italic. His shots are perhaps most representative of blur visible in fast moving games.
Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection
Posted: 20 Sep 2022, 11:58
by Chief Blur Buster
Discorz wrote: ↑20 Sep 2022, 06:17
Anonymous316387 wrote: ↑21 Jul 2022, 23:43
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Sorry for late reply...
Bijan takes his pursuits at 1920pps moving speed, default is 960pps. Faster speeds will naturally look blurrier. Links with speeds that are not 960 are marked
italic. His shots are perhaps most representative of blur visible in fast moving games.
Correct.
960pps pursuits can only be compared to 960pps pursuits, and 1920pps pursuits compared to other 1920pps pursuits.
1920pps pursuits are much blurrier than 960pps pursuits, but allows you to tell apart much smaller differences in ghosting and blurrings, including sub-millisecond artifacts that can still become human visible (0.5ms = 1 pixel every 2000 pixels/sec).
Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection
Posted: 21 Sep 2022, 16:14
by Anonymous316387
Discorz wrote: ↑20 Sep 2022, 06:17
Anonymous316387 wrote: ↑21 Jul 2022, 23:43
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Sorry for late reply...
Bijan takes his pursuits at 1920pps moving speed, default is 960pps. Faster speeds will naturally look blurrier. Links with speeds that are not 960 are marked
italic. His shots are perhaps most representative of blur visible in fast moving games.
thank you!
Anyway I've had this monitor and I've resend, very good monitor but not perfect ( certainly in my top 3 )
But I really want to test BenQ XL2566K in some days.