Re: Resolution of your eyes [YouTube video]
Posted: 17 Mar 2014, 12:00
From my experience, SVP definitely does a better job than any TV I've seen (it's probably pretty similar to WinDVD's system) and is somewhat configurable, but there's no way to overcome the inherent drawbacks of interpolation in the first place. It does come down to personal preference though. I personally find the interpolation artifacts FAR more distracting than the motion smoothness benefit provided.trey31 wrote:I'd have to re-install it to elaborate any further, but I noticed "smooth motion" in WinDVD Pro 11 (whichever version did 3D Blu Ray; might have been like "Pro Plus" or something like that) did a better job than several TV's with built-in motion smoothing. Combined with a motion smoothing TV it may fall apart though. I didn't play with it all that much.
I actually have heard of people doing this before. I'd try it myself but it's been years since I've been to a movie theater and don't plan on going back anytime soon.trey31 wrote:Interestingly enough, I read that Peter Jackson used HFR specifically to reduce eye fatigue in 3D on large screens like IMAX. Same article said James Cameron praised the method and intends to use it on all future 3D releases.
As someone who saw it in person, I GREATLY prefer HFR to 24hz. Also for future reference, RealD glasses can be modded for Left + Left lenses for watching 3D films in 2D, which would actually work great if you dislike 3D but want to experience HFR 3D movies. Also they can be purchased as well, but I'm pretty sure the RealD ones pop open and you could use 2 left and 2 right lenses from 2 pairs to make 2 pairs of 3D-to-2D glasses.
EDIT: IMAX glasses can be easily popped out and swapped. RealD glasses would require 15-45 minutes to mod as you'd have to remove the hinge pins and replace them after swapping the lenses.