The issue of Pursuit Camera With Motion Tests

Many sites including LinusTechTips, RTINGS, TomsHardware, and others use the free Blur Busters pursuit camera invention. Now also available as a rail-less smartphone wave, too!
Post Reply
lann
Posts: 10
Joined: 16 Jun 2024, 03:02

The issue of Pursuit Camera With Motion Tests

Post by lann » 13 Dec 2024, 00:25

Using a shutter speed of one-quarter of the refresh rate allows for accurate motion blur capture, but slower shutter speeds produce effects closer to real-world perception. When comparing motion blur on 60Hz, 120Hz, and 360Hz displays, should a uniform 1/15-second shutter speed be used, or should the shutter speed be adjusted differently for each case?

If perfect tracking is achievable, should all refresh rate displays use the slowest possible shutter speed?

lann
Posts: 10
Joined: 16 Jun 2024, 03:02

Re: The issue of Pursuit Camera With Motion Tests

Post by lann » 15 Dec 2024, 04:53

After I set up the test slider, all screens are tested with a shutter speed of 1/15s, right? This should be the fairest?

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11944
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: The issue of Pursuit Camera With Motion Tests

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 17 Dec 2024, 03:14

Hello,

Use a shutter speed of 4 refresh cycles. For 240Hz, that means 1/60sec. It's dictated by the design of the sync track. As long as you stack multiple refresh cycles, anything from 3 to 7 refresh cycles should look EXACTLY the same.

A properly done 1/30sec vs 1/60sec vs 1/45sec pursuit exposure at 240Hz should look exactly the same; but they look different because of photographer pursuit difficulty. Faster exposure is subject to less handshake/railvibrate/pursuit-mismatch error margins. So you get easier WSIWYG at faster exposure.

We have a pursuit camera forum, so I am moving the thread to the correct forum:
viewforum.php?f=23

- You don't have to use 4xHz always. For low Hz, you can use 3xHz, as long as you follow the guidelines (see diagrams posted in forum)
- We will be improving the sync track to allow tickcount adjustment (3xHz, 4xHz, 5xHz ... 8xHZ).

Currently we use a 4-tickout pursuit sync track, which makes it easiest at 4xHz, but 60Hz is very difficult at 1/15sec, so 3xHz is a compromise (1/20sec) to make it easier. Shorter exposures produces more reliable pursuit camera exposures that are easier to get closer to WYSIWYG.

Use these guidelines:

Image

Image

A 4-tick sync track is usable from 3 exposed refresh cycles (minimum) through 7 exosed refresh cycles (maximum), as long as you've become very good at interpreting the error margins in the sync track. A full 2x tickmark (8 refresh cycles) exposures can be confused by slowly-skewing bright tickmarks, giving you too many redherring effects.

TestUFO 3.0 will have an adjustable sync track and automatic helpers ("Exposure: 1/[##]sec") based on current tickmark count and automatically detected refresh rate.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on: BlueSky | Twitter | Facebook

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Post Reply