Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection

Everything about displays and monitors. 120Hz, 144Hz, 240Hz, 4K, 1440p, input lag, display shopping, monitor purchase decisions, compare, versus, debate, and more. Questions? Just ask!
Anonymous316387

Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection

Post by Anonymous316387 » 21 Jul 2022, 23:43

Discorz wrote:
29 Apr 2022, 02:32
Glad you guys liked it. Let me know if u have any suggestions for improvement.
Hi, very great job.
Can you please add the XG27AQM ?
Same panel as PG279QM without G-sync module.

Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...

User avatar
Discorz
VIP Member
Posts: 999
Joined: 06 Sep 2019, 02:39
Location: Europe, Croatia
Contact:

Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection

Post by Discorz » 20 Sep 2022, 06:17

Anonymous316387 wrote:
21 Jul 2022, 23:43
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Sorry for late reply...

Bijan takes his pursuits at 1920pps moving speed, default is 960pps. Faster speeds will naturally look blurrier. Links with speeds that are not 960 are marked italic. His shots are perhaps most representative of blur visible in fast moving games.
Compare UFOs | Do you use Blur Reduction? | Smooth Frog | Latency Split Test
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11647
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 20 Sep 2022, 11:58

Discorz wrote:
20 Sep 2022, 06:17
Anonymous316387 wrote:
21 Jul 2022, 23:43
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Sorry for late reply...

Bijan takes his pursuits at 1920pps moving speed, default is 960pps. Faster speeds will naturally look blurrier. Links with speeds that are not 960 are marked italic. His shots are perhaps most representative of blur visible in fast moving games.
Correct.
960pps pursuits can only be compared to 960pps pursuits, and 1920pps pursuits compared to other 1920pps pursuits.

1920pps pursuits are much blurrier than 960pps pursuits, but allows you to tell apart much smaller differences in ghosting and blurrings, including sub-millisecond artifacts that can still become human visible (0.5ms = 1 pixel every 2000 pixels/sec).
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Anonymous316387

Re: Compare UFOs - Ghosting / Pursuit Camera Motion Test Collection

Post by Anonymous316387 » 21 Sep 2022, 16:14

Discorz wrote:
20 Sep 2022, 06:17
Anonymous316387 wrote:
21 Jul 2022, 23:43
Nvm, I've seen the XG27AQM on your list but...the picture of Bijan Jamshidi are not that good...
Sorry for late reply...

Bijan takes his pursuits at 1920pps moving speed, default is 960pps. Faster speeds will naturally look blurrier. Links with speeds that are not 960 are marked italic. His shots are perhaps most representative of blur visible in fast moving games.
thank you!

Anyway I've had this monitor and I've resend, very good monitor but not perfect ( certainly in my top 3 )

But I really want to test BenQ XL2566K in some days.

Post Reply