Ghosting masked by motion blur? Strobe-backlight artifacts vs ghosting artifacts?
Posted: 27 Mar 2020, 06:32
Hey, recently I said something in a video review where I am now wondering whether this was correct at all. Basically I stated that activating blur reduction let's us see the individual ghost images that were masked by motion blur without blur reduction.
I'm referring to those two pursuit camera pictures I made from the Acer VG270UP:
My thought process (inspired by viewtopic.php?t=238 and various articles on the BB page) was that the blur reduction pretty much takes a "snapshot" of the ghost image at every backlight strobe. So the ghost image for every frame is displayed clearly as there is close to no motion blur. Without blur reduction the image will be displayed over a longer period of time as the backlight isn't turned off. So the ghost image, just like the original image, would be subject to eye tracking motion blur.
On the other hand: To my understanding the pixel transitions that create those ghost images are not discrete. So is there really something like an individual ghost image?
In case you're interested, you will find my statement at about 3:08:
I'm referring to those two pursuit camera pictures I made from the Acer VG270UP:
My thought process (inspired by viewtopic.php?t=238 and various articles on the BB page) was that the blur reduction pretty much takes a "snapshot" of the ghost image at every backlight strobe. So the ghost image for every frame is displayed clearly as there is close to no motion blur. Without blur reduction the image will be displayed over a longer period of time as the backlight isn't turned off. So the ghost image, just like the original image, would be subject to eye tracking motion blur.
On the other hand: To my understanding the pixel transitions that create those ghost images are not discrete. So is there really something like an individual ghost image?
In case you're interested, you will find my statement at about 3:08: