LG CX vs. RetroTINK-4K BFI - confusing...

High Hz on OLED produce excellent strobeless motion blur reduction with fast GtG pixel response. It is easier to tell apart 60Hz vs 120Hz vs 240Hz on OLED than LCD, and more visible to mainstream. Includes WOLED and QD-OLED displays.
tong
Posts: 42
Joined: 10 Jul 2023, 14:37

Re: LG CX vs. RetroTINK-4K BFI - confusing...

Post by tong » 08 Jun 2024, 10:38

I think 480hz OLED with rolling scan-type BFI is the way going forward, Chief. But unfortunately most people are still unaware of the benefits of blur reduction. Just look at JayZ's review of the Viewsonic OLED, which offers the best BFI implementation among OLED monitors. Completely brushed aside.

phpBB [video]

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11726
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: LG CX vs. RetroTINK-4K BFI - confusing...

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 11 Jun 2024, 20:30

tong wrote:
08 Jun 2024, 10:38
But unfortunately most people are still unaware of the benefits of blur reduction. Just look at JayZ's review of the Viewsonic OLED, which offers the best BFI implementation among OLED monitors. Completely brushed aside.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGYyV-v9c1E
The retro-users silo don't often communicate to the esports-silo.

So some (explainably) YouTubers are losing a bit of Amazon Affiliate revenues by not preaching to both nearly-independent choirs (retro vs esports) since they are not familiar with both markets like Blur Busters is...
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Post Reply