External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

High Hz on OLED produce excellent strobeless motion blur reduction with fast GtG pixel response. It is easier to tell apart 60Hz vs 120Hz vs 240Hz on OLED than LCD, and more visible to mainstream. Includes WOLED and QD-OLED displays.
User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11371
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 15 Aug 2023, 21:12

3Y3 wrote:
15 Aug 2023, 06:28
Chief Blur Buster wrote:
14 Aug 2023, 18:52
If you have a 240Hz display, please stare at the laws of physics of TestUFO Variable-Persistence BFI (designed for 240Hz displays) -- these are the single-strobe BFI choices Retrotink can give you for any 240Hz display. This educational scientific animation, helps demonstrates that pulsewidth dictates persistence display motion blur.
on a 240Hz LCD, that 60fps + 3x BFI looks clearer motion than 240fps
Oh, that effect!

Normally, 60fps with 3:1 black:visible ratio is identical blur to 240fps.

Occasionally, LCDs can behave 'better' because GtG pixel response behaviors to black color is usually fast, and away from black color is usually slower. This can create an effect where BFI'd 60fps or 120fps (Without a strobe backlight) has clearer motion than 240fps 240Hz.

This is only because of LCD GtG's asymmetry for different pixel color pairs. With GtG fast-to-black and GtG slow-away-from-black, will prolong the BFI slightly, and create the effect that you describe.

I have seen this happen before with some LCD panels. It's really interesting how asymmetric GtG problems (that normally causes ghosting) can create some... 'happy accidents' like these.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
To support Blur Busters - see Multiple Lists of Best Gaming Monitors
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

NeonPizza
Posts: 57
Joined: 20 Oct 2021, 03:01

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by NeonPizza » 30 Aug 2023, 13:26

So when exactly is RetroTink4K arriving this year?

And it's been conformed to not work with 30fps content like broadcasted TV shows from the 80's and 90's? Just 24fps/aka movies?

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11371
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 01 Sep 2023, 19:09

NeonPizza wrote:
30 Aug 2023, 13:26
So when exactly is RetroTink4K arriving this year?

And it's been conformed to not work with 30fps content like broadcasted TV shows from the 80's and 90's? Just 24fps/aka movies?
I have given Mike (Retrotink creator) the algorithm for 2:2 inverse telecine and I think he'll add that feature. (PAL 25fps and NTSC 30fps).

Remember, Retrotink 4K is a firmware upgradeable box.

The best way to ask Retrotink 4K questions is on the Retrotink 4K discord: https://discord.gg/kAn6w6FD ... I am simply helping Mike with the algorithms and I don't have answers on release dates.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
To support Blur Busters - see Multiple Lists of Best Gaming Monitors
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

whiskersnout
Posts: 4
Joined: 31 Mar 2023, 12:49

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by whiskersnout » 05 Sep 2023, 02:58

Chief Blur Buster wrote:
06 Aug 2023, 00:12
That's because it converts retro SDR video input (e.g. Super Nintendo) to a HDR colorspace, then applies HDR brightness-boosting. We found that in certain cases, we can brighten 50%-cadence 60Hz BFI to become brighter than 60Hz non-BFI.
Can you elaborate further on the certain cases? In one of your Twitter posts you mentioned the LG OLED TV's, but have you also found the same in any of the OLED PC monitors?

NeonPizza
Posts: 57
Joined: 20 Oct 2021, 03:01

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by NeonPizza » 06 Sep 2023, 20:53

Chief Blur Buster wrote:
01 Sep 2023, 19:09
NeonPizza wrote:
30 Aug 2023, 13:26
So when exactly is RetroTink4K arriving this year?

And it's been conformed to not work with 30fps content like broadcasted TV shows from the 80's and 90's? Just 24fps/aka movies?
I have given Mike (Retrotink creator) the algorithm for 2:2 inverse telecine and I think he'll add that feature. (PAL 25fps and NTSC 30fps).

Remember, Retrotink 4K is a firmware upgradeable box.

The best way to ask Retrotink 4K questions is on the Retrotink 4K discord: https://discord.gg/kAn6w6FD ... I am simply helping Mike with the algorithms and I don't have answers on release dates.

Nice! I'm itching to get one of these. I just can't stand watching movies on my LG C1 OLED anymore, I've given up. The high motion blur just kills it for me. It almost feels like I'm watching movies on an LCD with perfect blacks. Back to the plasma until Tink4 eventually releases this year. And if it does the trick, I'll finally be ditching my S60.

With RetroTink4K i'm assuming I'll be able to get the motion persistence down to 6.2ms for 24 & 30fps, since that's what the C1's Motionpro High is limited to, for 60fps content. Not entirely sure how that translates over, but the C1 can also get persistence down to 3.2ms when playing games at 120fps and using MotionPro High. I'd be pretty content with 6.2ms for now for movies & TV shows, although i wish it were 4, ala Retrotink4's max persistence.

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11371
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 18 Sep 2023, 15:55

NeonPizza wrote:
06 Sep 2023, 20:53
With RetroTink4K i'm assuming I'll be able to get the motion persistence down to 6.2ms for 24 & 30fps, since that's what the C1's Motionpro High is limited to, for 60fps content. Not entirely sure how that translates over, but the C1 can also get persistence down to 3.2ms when playing games at 120fps and using MotionPro High. I'd be pretty content with 6.2ms for now for movies & TV shows, although i wish it were 4, ala Retrotink4's max persistence.
It depends on your TV, and whether you can combine the hardware BFI and the software BFI.

However, for a pure software-only BFI approach, your minimum persistence is max Hz refresh time. So if your display is capable of 144Hz, your minimum persistence achievable via software-only means is 1/144sec = 6.94ms.

That being said, some people can combine hardware BFI and software BFI for some different results -- like turning 120Hz hardware strobe into 60Hz hardware strobe by using software BFI to black out every other hardware strobe. Then your persistence in that case, is what the hardware offered you.

Now C1 is limited to 120Hz, so your minimum persistence with software BFI will be 8.3ms (at 120Hz).

Now if you use 96Hz double strobe, to simulate a 35mm film projector -- you will get 10ms+10ms (double image effect, using 96Hz to generate 48Hz BFI flicker to mimic a 24fps double-strobed film projector)
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
To support Blur Busters - see Multiple Lists of Best Gaming Monitors
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

GammaLyrae
Posts: 114
Joined: 28 Mar 2018, 01:44

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by GammaLyrae » 18 Sep 2023, 17:03

I wonder what this box would look like connected to any of the pc oled monitors out there. A quick glance at rtings reviews on the current lot suggests that the full rise out of black time takes one refresh cycle, with no special pixel overdrive or compensation available to accelerate this (ie, rising out of black at 60hz takes 16.xxms, suggesting that the first pixel change is moving from black to whatever dark Grey it can muster, then the next refresh only has to move from that dark Grey to another color, a much faster switch)

It's a notable difference as the rise times measured on LG tvs is much faster, suggesting their firmware engineers spent a good degree of time finding out how to accelerate rising out of black times with minimal visible artifacting at 60hz/120hz.

I would speculate that the retrotinks software bfi would look good on a TV oled but may end up undesirable on an oled monitor. I think the best circumstance for an oled monitor would be 60hz software bfi with the monitor itself accepting a 240hz signal, this way you can get an on/on/off/off cadence, allowing for at least one frame's worth of time to display the intended final image. Could even offer better than expected mprt if that first frame spends the bulk of its time closer to black than it does the intended image.

NeonPizza
Posts: 57
Joined: 20 Oct 2021, 03:01

Re: External BFI Injection -- I am working with Retrotink 4K!

Post by NeonPizza » Today, 13:15

Chief Blur Buster wrote:
18 Sep 2023, 15:55
NeonPizza wrote:
06 Sep 2023, 20:53
With RetroTink4K i'm assuming I'll be able to get the motion persistence down to 6.2ms for 24 & 30fps, since that's what the C1's Motionpro High is limited to, for 60fps content. Not entirely sure how that translates over, but the C1 can also get persistence down to 3.2ms when playing games at 120fps and using MotionPro High. I'd be pretty content with 6.2ms for now for movies & TV shows, although i wish it were 4, ala Retrotink4's max persistence.
It depends on your TV, and whether you can combine the hardware BFI and the software BFI.

However, for a pure software-only BFI approach, your minimum persistence is max Hz refresh time. So if your display is capable of 144Hz, your minimum persistence achievable via software-only means is 1/144sec = 6.94ms.

That being said, some people can combine hardware BFI and software BFI for some different results -- like turning 120Hz hardware strobe into 60Hz hardware strobe by using software BFI to black out every other hardware strobe. Then your persistence in that case, is what the hardware offered you.

Now C1 is limited to 120Hz, so your minimum persistence with software BFI will be 8.3ms (at 120Hz).

Now if you use 96Hz double strobe, to simulate a 35mm film projector -- you will get 10ms+10ms (double image effect, using 96Hz to generate 48Hz BFI flicker to mimic a 24fps double-strobed film projector)
Gotcha!
Well, 6.94ms on a 144hz S90C QD-LED should do the trick. I just wish Retrotink4K pulled it off at 4K rather than 1080p.
Which means i'll have to stick with 65" instead of 77". Don't feel comfortable going with a 77 unless I'm feeding it native 4K.

Post Reply