Agree. Room for that. I usually put about 10 words in a new topic title, and that phrase could most certainly be thrown in. But I want to also emphasize the temporal nature and advertise the boom of third party framegen options.
While it's included (spatial framegen in additional to temporal framegen, to increase frame rates) -- I kind of don't want to be overly focussed on non-temporal aspects of game graphics, so I'd like to emphasize the temporal aspects as Blur Busters mainly prefers to focus on temporals (GtG / MPRT / lag / VRR / Hz / motion clarity / stutter / sync technologies / framerate etc). Anything temporal, that is my brain's speciality. These topics are the types I have the most fun with, and kind of want to continue specializing. But yes, I need help.
Like perhaps "Game Graphics -- Including Frame Rate, DLSS, FSR, XeSS, TAA, Stutters" or whatever. Some highlights to 'steer' discourse to preferred temporal-domain topics that I'm expert at. Collateral non-temporal game graphics discussion would certainly be allowed but I kind of want the forum title to mostly emphasize the temporalness of Blur Busters.
Somewhere in between. I think "Later in 2024" will be the charm.
I hear you there. We can only pick so many blur busting battles; Blur Busters needs more help to battle more blur busting fronts, in both volunteer help (e.g. moderators) / paid help (e.g. article writers). That is something I intend to continue to work on resolving as time passes, it's a lot of three steps forward, two steps back going on, behind the scenes, as we exit the pandemic-era cutbacks...Hybred wrote: ↑16 Jan 2024, 15:26The biggest benefit of creating it before is bringing awareness & potentially helping users out by sharing user end tips with each other, so that's up to you. I just suggested it as I have personally recieved questions from users who were confused about why Blur Busters doesn't tackle other things that effect motion clarity so I offered an explanation then a potential compromise/solution.