Less Motion Blur in 60fps 144hz than 60fps 60hz

[RealNC]

16.7ms = 100% motion blur
8.3ms = Reduces 50% motion blur
4ms = Reduces 75% motion blur

But where does that leave 144fps? I'm guessing it reduces total motion blur by just over 55%?

Well, if you set 60FPS as 100%, then 144FPS is a 58% reduction. (100 - 60 * 100 / 144)

[NeonPizza]

16.7ms = 100% motion blur
8.3ms = Reduces 50% motion blur
4ms = Reduces 75% motion blur

But where does that leave 144fps? I'm guessing it reduces total motion blur by just over 55%?

Well, if you set 60FPS as 100%, then 144FPS is a 58% reduction. (100 - 60 * 100 / 144)

Thanks!
Which means, when using RetroTINK4K's Triple strobe Black frame insertion for '24-30'fps content like with Movies & TV, it will be able to remove 58% of motion blur thanks to the Samsung S90D QD-OLED's 144hz(6.9ms persistence), and I was told by the Chief that TINK4K's Triple strobe BFI will also reduce more judder than a plasma AND crt, on OLED.

I mean, OLED's are notorious for having excess choppy film judder, noticeably more than plasma. So with these two upgrades, I'll be over the moon. The downside is the 1080p cap, which in all honestly is perfectly fine at least for when rocking either a 55" & 65". And then there's 'mild' BFI flicker on whites. I'm assuming triple strobe flicker is less noticeable than internal OLED TV BFI?

If a TINK8k eventually happens with 4K BFI support, i'll be down and that means i'll be able to finally upgrade to a 77". Because as is, 1080p probably won't look too hot at that size