Page 2 of 2

Re: PG27AQN 240Hz vs 360Hz ULMB2

Posted: 29 Oct 2023, 20:21
by zweepz
jorimt wrote:
26 Oct 2023, 18:48
hart wrote:
26 Oct 2023, 17:56
for me 240 ulmb 2 is stil way clearer than the oled

rtings images for example as their review was used previously, oled vs 240 ulmb2 at 50% pwm

[...]

sorry, maybe I'm understanding you wrong, just that I am interested in this as I had both asus now at home and I'm trying to decide which one is staying and I think the AQN is the better contender for now, specially in motion clarity side to side it's on another level
What I see in those images is what I expect; the OLED has persistence blur due to non-strobed sample-and-hold, and the LCD has strobe crosstalk ghosting due to slower pixel response times.

You subjectively prefer the latter, and that's perfectly fine. There's no need for FOMO or justification of a purchase. Both are good, and both serve certain preferences. There isn't a single "right" answer in this case.
And will the upcoming Oleds that have "BFI"(?If thats the right thing) be the best of both?

Re: PG27AQN 240Hz vs 360Hz ULMB2

Posted: 29 Oct 2023, 20:24
by jorimt
zweepz wrote:
29 Oct 2023, 20:21
And will the upcoming Oleds that have "BFI"(?If thats the right thing) be the best of both?
Unlikely for a while yet; OLEDs still can't achieve a high enough sustained full field brightness to reach the same low MPRT levels LCDs can when strobing.

Re: PG27AQN 240Hz vs 360Hz ULMB2

Posted: 29 Oct 2023, 20:35
by zweepz
jorimt wrote:
29 Oct 2023, 20:24
zweepz wrote:
29 Oct 2023, 20:21
And will the upcoming Oleds that have "BFI"(?If thats the right thing) be the best of both?
Unlikely for a while yet; OLEDs still can't achieve a high enough sustained full field brightness to reach the same low MPRT levels LCDs can when strobing.
Thanks, that helps alot actually for my plans! :)