Hi when i use my monitor at 240hz + gysnc , browsing web
as example when i am scrolling page down i see some blurring , also in games too
but 144hz + ulmb makes me feel much better in games and in reading texts too,
not sure how to name it but i can show
this one is 240hz + gsync results
this one is 144hz + ulmb results
look to the ufo in the middle , the 240hz has always leaves something behind when background is lighter and its clearly visible
is it normal , can i fix it?
my gpu is gtx 1080ti best regards
asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
Re: asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
Although your photos look contradictory (and not accurate) to me... but still:
When using 240Hz+GSYNC, use Normal OD setting, and not Extreme. This should fix the problem.ballot wrote: look to the ufo in the middle, the 240hz has always leaves something behind when background is lighter and its clearly visible
Re: asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
Chase Test with background whitemello wrote:Although your photos look contradictory (and not accurate) to me... but still:
When using 240Hz+GSYNC, use Normal OD setting, and not Extreme. This should fix the problem.ballot wrote: look to the ufo in the middle, the 240hz has always leaves something behind when background is lighter and its clearly visible
240hz + gysnc :
140hz + ulmb :
as you see the orange bar's a part is totally red always, when i made the test as first i thinked test's normally as that.
and now i tested with closing OD. it now worked fixed the bugs. but what exactly is OD.
thank you anyway
Re: asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Re: asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
Well, that is what ulmb does? Removes blur.
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11653
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
It's normal for 144Hz ULMB to be sharper than 240Hz non-ULMB.
This is just a normal feature of strobe backlights. We've noticed this behaviour with LightBoost a few years back where even 100Hz LightBoost was much clearer than 144Hz:
Currently, right now, it would require approximately a ~1000Hz display to achieve the same motion clarity as modern ULMB displays. A good educational article about how to reduce motion blur without strobing (ala LightBoost/ULMB) is found at Blur Busters Law: The Amazing Journey To Future 1000Hz Displays.
Blur reduction via strobe backlights:
4ms flash = 4ms MPRT persistence
2ms flash = 2ms MPRT persistence
1ms flash = 1ms MPRT persistence
Blur reduction via flickerfree ultra-high Hz
4ms refresh cycle (~240Hz) = 4ms MPRT persistence
2ms refresh cycle (~480Hz) = 2ms MPRT persistence
1ms refresh cycle (~1000Hz) = 1ms MPRT persistence
So that's why low-Hz strobing can sometimes look better than high-Hz unstrobed.
Advanced Users Only: Also, if photographing, we usually do pursuit camera". Pan your smartphone sideways while taking a picture. A moving camera lens is an equivalent of a moving eyeball. You must track lens whether it's a camera lens your human eye, for accurate perception of display motion blur. You can use the ladder track (Sync Track) at http://www.testufo.com/ghosting and make sure that the tickmarks align. Display reviewers use a camera rail -- many testers use our motion test inventions -- but some creative end users can carefully hand-pan their smartphone sideways while taking a photo. Just make sure that the ladder track (Sync Track) tickmarks align up in the resulting photo, just like it does with your human eyes.
This is just a normal feature of strobe backlights. We've noticed this behaviour with LightBoost a few years back where even 100Hz LightBoost was much clearer than 144Hz:
Currently, right now, it would require approximately a ~1000Hz display to achieve the same motion clarity as modern ULMB displays. A good educational article about how to reduce motion blur without strobing (ala LightBoost/ULMB) is found at Blur Busters Law: The Amazing Journey To Future 1000Hz Displays.
Blur reduction via strobe backlights:
4ms flash = 4ms MPRT persistence
2ms flash = 2ms MPRT persistence
1ms flash = 1ms MPRT persistence
Blur reduction via flickerfree ultra-high Hz
4ms refresh cycle (~240Hz) = 4ms MPRT persistence
2ms refresh cycle (~480Hz) = 2ms MPRT persistence
1ms refresh cycle (~1000Hz) = 1ms MPRT persistence
So that's why low-Hz strobing can sometimes look better than high-Hz unstrobed.
Advanced Users Only: Also, if photographing, we usually do pursuit camera". Pan your smartphone sideways while taking a picture. A moving camera lens is an equivalent of a moving eyeball. You must track lens whether it's a camera lens your human eye, for accurate perception of display motion blur. You can use the ladder track (Sync Track) at http://www.testufo.com/ghosting and make sure that the tickmarks align. Display reviewers use a camera rail -- many testers use our motion test inventions -- but some creative end users can carefully hand-pan their smartphone sideways while taking a photo. Just make sure that the ladder track (Sync Track) tickmarks align up in the resulting photo, just like it does with your human eyes.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: asus pg258q gives better results at 120hz than 240hz
I didn't notice you're using ULMB.
Yes, 144Hz ULMB is much clearer than 240Hz non-ULMB. In fact, even 60Hz ULMB is much clearer than 240Hz non-ULMB. 60Hz ULMB is usuallyy as clear as 1000Hz non-ULMB.
Why do you think so many people here still love CRT monitors? They're even better than LCD monitors with ULMB.
Yes, 144Hz ULMB is much clearer than 240Hz non-ULMB. In fact, even 60Hz ULMB is much clearer than 240Hz non-ULMB. 60Hz ULMB is usuallyy as clear as 1000Hz non-ULMB.
Why do you think so many people here still love CRT monitors? They're even better than LCD monitors with ULMB.
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.