Brand Names of Strobing: LightBoost / ULMB / Turbo240 / etc

Ask about motion blur reduction in gaming monitors. Includes ULMB (Ultra Low Motion Blur), NVIDIA LightBoost, ASUS ELMB, BenQ/Zowie DyAc, Turbo240, ToastyX Strobelight, etc.
User avatar
Ahigh
Posts: 95
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 19:22

Re: Sequels to LightBoost and Similiar

Post by Ahigh » 02 Jan 2014, 21:17

Chief Blur Buster wrote:
Just to confirm -- that appears to be strobing at 120Hz, rather than at 60Hz?
No, that's a 60Hz framerate on the Sony KDL-47W802A with a 1080p60 input signal in "Game Mode" with "MotionFlow Impulse" and a 1000hz camera (EX-ZR1000 camera)

The moving image is as sharp as a CRT. There is just a very very faint ghost image from the previous frame that is slightly visible. Other than that, no flaws at all in the motion portrayal that I can see. The ghost image is visible with a black background, but not really distracting. I imagine the ghost image would be less obvious with more than a black background.

All of these results would not have happened at all if not for the research from this page from the Chief:

Sony “Motionflow Impulse” reduces motion blur without interpolation

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11653
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Sequels to LightBoost and Similiar

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 03 Jan 2014, 00:34

Ahigh wrote:The moving image is as sharp as a CRT. There is just a very very faint ghost image from the previous frame that is slightly visible. Other than that, no flaws at all in the motion portrayal that I can see. The ghost image is visible with a black background, but not really distracting. I imagine the ghost image would be less obvious with more than a black background.
Aha, now I understand. That's the inter-refresh crosstalk (which I now call "strobe crosstalk" -- the remnants of the previous LCD refresh leaking into the next strobe).

It is an attribute of most strobe-backlight LCD's. It varies depending on the panel, sometimes it's almost completely gone (e.g. there is nearly no inter-refresh crosstalk on the VG248QE panel in the center band in LightBoost mode, and only minor at the top/bottom edges of the screen).

The strobe crosstalk on most good, new strobe-backlight LCD's is faint enough that it becomes unnoticeable in the visual clutter of detailed panning imagery such as http://www.testufo.com/photo

I have four different strobe backlights sitting here (LightBoost, ULMB, Turbo240, and BENQ XL2720Z Blur Reduction), and all four of them generate slightly less to much less strobe crosstalk than what I see in your high speed videos, so I was curious. But yes, even the motion blur elimination is still very impressive even when there is a fair bit of strobe crosstalk.

A good test pattern to test for strobe crosstalk (ghosting) is http://www.testufo.com/ghosting



BTW, you might be interested in playing with pursuiting the camera (using a longer exposure & panning the camera while taking a photo) -- see pursuit camera instructions for more information.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

User avatar
Ahigh
Posts: 95
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 19:22

Brand Names of Strobing: LightBoost / ULMB / Turbo240 / etc

Post by Ahigh » 03 Jan 2014, 03:39

Yeah, I was doing pursuit camera but just pursuing it like the cat was just using instincts and my limbs.

SS4
Posts: 118
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 17:08
Location: Québec

Brand Names: LightBoost / ULMB / Turbo240 / etc

Post by SS4 » 04 Jan 2014, 11:48

Regarding lightboost if it were compatible with g sync. Wouldnt the strobe effect feel weird since the FPS can change constantly? I'm pretty sure the eye will notice some difference between faster and slower strobe, maybe not if it stays above 72 fps or more which is around what the eye can perceive i believe.
Also is the fact that those 2 things not compatible hardware or software limitation or something else?

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11653
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Brand Names of Strobing: LightBoost / ULMB / Turbo240 / etc

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 24 Jan 2014, 03:38

Renamed thread topic, to brand names.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Post Reply