Test Bench 1.2 Changelog
Meaning:RTINGS wrote:
- Added more motion blur pictures to show the backlight strobing performance across different refresh rates and modes.
- Monitor's refresh rate and the "in-game" frame rate are set to the same frequency, but we now test with VRR enabled.
- VRR enabled
- monitor set to max refresh rate
- vrr framerate set to 'max', 120 or other fps
BUT in some cases their camera tracking accuracy is still off and they use anti-aliased edge image patterns. So if they captured fastest persistence displays like CRT photo would still look blurry. Meaning given motion photo would never be an accurate demonstration of display's persistence. They also use differently sized patterns for different pixel density. That is something to have in mind. I e-mailed them and pointed this out as well as suggested some other changes regarding motion photos.
Here are some examples:
M32Q Backlight Strobing + VRR, 93 ppi
RTINGS 120 FPS
RE-TEST 120 FPS
VG279QM, Backlight Strobing + VRR, 81 ppi
RTINGS 120 FPS
RE-TEST 120 FPS
∼960 pps