Feel like this is unorthodox so just wonder what Chief Blur Buster thinks, if anythings objectionable.
My display brightness flickers when LFC engages/disengages, so for a game which is almost always below 120fps does it make sense to raise LFC 120-240 and cap FPS 116~ so LFC never disengages? Specifically 119-240Hz as that's as specific as CRU lets you be and actual max Hz is 239.957Hz. On a 360Hz display you could do 180-360Hz which would basically keep you in LFC for all new AAA games with max settings.
Any reason this is a bad idea?
Life would be easier to lower it 30-240Hz as I would never get low enough to engage LFC, but then I'm getting half or less of the Hz I could be.
Raising LFC to 120 on 240Hz display?
Talk about NVIDIA G-SYNC, a variable refresh rate (VRR) technology. G-SYNC eliminates stutters, tearing, and reduces input lag. List of G-SYNC Monitors.
Jump to
- The Main Lobby
- ↳ General — Displays, Graphics & More
- ↳ News / Rumors / Conventions
- ↳ Input Lag / Display Lag / Network Lag
- ↳ Display Comfort — Eyestrain / Headaches / Motionsick
- Everything Better Than 60Hz™
- ↳ Eliminating Motion Blur — LightBoost / ULMB / ELMB / DyAc
- ↳ OLED Displays
- ↳ G-SYNC
- ↳ FreeSync
- ↳ Game Consoles — XBOX and PlayStation — ONE / Series S / Series X / PS5
- ↳ BENQ Zowie Tweaking — Strobe Utility / Blur Reduction / DyAc
- ↳ Display Overclocking
- The Laboratory
- ↳ Test UFO Motion Tests
- ↳ Area 51: Display Science, Research & Engineering
- ↳ Software Developers / Low-Lag Code / Game Programming
- ↳ Pursuit Camera Testing of Display Motion Blur
- ↳ High Frame Rate Video (HFR, UltraHFR, 120fps, 240fps, 1000fps)
- The Cafeteria
- ↳ Offtopic Lounge
- ↳ Niche Issues Affecting Latency — Electrical, Interference, EMI, Unexpected Causes, etc.
- ↳ Forum System / Registration / Suggestions