Page 2 of 5

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 15 Feb 2019, 10:27
by hnau
Notty_PT wrote:I can´t stress this enough, even for pro players playing competitive. Having a steady framerate and USING Gsync/FreeSync, is a must for your aim. Trust me. Even if you notice the mouse a tiny bit laggier compared to uncapped frames + 240hz.
What about 144hz on a non-gsync monitor? I'm still rocking a VG248QE from 2013 and plan to hop to a XG2402 the next time there's a decent sale. In the meantime would it be better to go uncapped at 144hz or +fps_max 144 in terms of aim/muscle memory? Right now I'm running Apex w/ "-novid +cl_showfps 4 +fps_max 144 -freq 144" which feels decent, but maybe fps_max 0 would be better when my monitor has no VRR support?

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 15 Feb 2019, 12:25
by takoid
hnau wrote:
Notty_PT wrote:I can´t stress this enough, even for pro players playing competitive. Having a steady framerate and USING Gsync/FreeSync, is a must for your aim. Trust me. Even if you notice the mouse a tiny bit laggier compared to uncapped frames + 240hz.
What about 144hz on a non-gsync monitor? I'm still rocking a VG248QE from 2013 and plan to hop to a XG2402 the next time there's a decent sale. In the meantime would it be better to go uncapped at 144hz or +fps_max 144 in terms of aim/muscle memory? Right now I'm running Apex w/ "-novid +cl_showfps 4 +fps_max 144 -freq 144" which feels decent, but maybe fps_max 0 would be better when my monitor has no VRR support?
With a 144hz monitor without G-Sync your best bet is to get rid of the -freq and +fps_max launch options because they are pointless for your setup. The game has a 144 FPS cap by default which is perfectly suited for your monitor.

I'm not sure whether NVCP V-Sync is recommended for non G-Sync users or not but that might be something to play around with.

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 03 Mar 2019, 06:52
by knypol
I have pg258q and this game looks realy weird when unlocking fps. Screen is set to 240Hz with Gsync and everything above 144 fpx looks much worse than caped to 144 (above 144 I can almost see double edges on the landscapes. Even image is more blurry at 240fps than 144 - and yes I can reach 240+ in training room). Looks like above 144fps overdrive is somehow messed up. I made test in BF1 and there is no such problem. Is it possible that game engine could influence hardware so much?

ps. Is it better to have steady 144fps on 240Hz refresh than fluctuating 144 to 237 fps in terms of clarity? Are the fluctuating fps influece overdrive in monitor?

or maybe I should just set my monitor to 144Hz to get optimal overdrive and motion clarity?

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 06 Mar 2019, 00:51
by YukonTrooper
Can't remember where I read it, but apparently the engine is designed to run optimally <144fps. I run @165Hz for the reduced input latency benefits, but I allow the engine to natively cap my FPS @ 144 without any command line arguments.

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 06 Mar 2019, 16:28
by Chief Blur Buster
For advanced readers, I insert my famous pandora boxes here and there.

I explain the double-image effects during stutters on sample-and-hold (non-ULMB)
Skip of behind-the-scenes tech stuff bores you.
Read if you're a fan.

<Blur Busters Technology Pandora Box>

Explanation Of Double Image Effects On Non-Strobed Displays During Erratic Stutter/Judder

Normally, non-blur-reduction modes don't create double-edge effects in sample-hold displays, but --

Certain framerate divisors -- like a cadence of 2/3 framerate (e.g. 160fps at 240Hz) -- can create a double-edge effect without using motion blur reduction.

The double image effect has long been a fixture of 3:2 judder by home theater videophiles. Many have speculated why there's a double image even on LCD (non-strobed). The explanation is surprisingly simple for those who already understand display persistence (ala http://www.testufo.com/eyetracking) -- it's simply two simultaneously overlapping motion blurs (a thinner motion blur and a thicker motion blur).

This is because two very clear stutter harmonics are overlapping each other. 160fps at 240Hz generates a 2:1 pulldown effect creating a judder (erratic stutter). Long stutter, short stutter, long stutter, short stutter, alternating continuously.

144fps at 240Hz is more erratic but is not too far off the mark. So this can create prolonged screen persistence at one edge of the display motion blur, creating an impression of a duplicate image, thanks to increased persistence at one end of the stutter amplitude.

And you know how high-frequency stutter blends into motion blur?

Just like when you stare at http://www.testufo.com#count=4 .... the fastest UFOs are just motion blur and the slowest UFOs are just stutter. The faster an edge vibrates, the vibrates is beyond human flicker threshold, and is just persistence display motion blur. Yep persistence = stutter. It's a continuum. Low-Hz guitar strings vibrate noticeably. High-Hz guitar strings vibrate so fast it's blurry. Stutter on high-Hz displays is _exactly_ this.

Persistence is stutter. Stutter is persistence. It's a continuum. Don't believe me? Look at http://www.testufo.com/vrr then -- watch a slowly ramping frame rate on a variable refresh rate display and it's just Eureka like E=mc^2. Which is easily seen in variable refresh rate ramping animations like http://www.testufo.com/vrr ... Once you see those animations, it's that simple!

Yep, both of the stutter harmonic frequencies blends into their two separate thicknesses of motion blurs.

High-frequency edge stutter vibrates so fast, the edge of moving objects simply blends to motion blur (like a high-Hz guitar string that vibrates so fast, it is blurry) as seen in Blur Busters Law And The Amazing Journey To Future 1000Hz Displays. At high frequencies (framerates far beyond human flicker fusion threshold), stutter creates persistence (motion blur).

Erratic high-frequency stutter can create two different intensities of motion blur (e.g. 320fps at 480Hz) -- stronger motion blur at leading edge of motion. And fainter motion blur at trailing edge of motion. So even the erraticness can blend differently.

That's why you sometimes see an increased double-image effect during erratic stutter (e.g. 160fps at 240Hz) on non-impulsed displays. You're creating a pulldown, e.g. 2:1:2:1:2:1 -- where every other frame is repeated twice if you don't have VRR with perfect gametime=frametime=refreshtime sync for ideal VRR. Especially with ultra-accurate frame rate capping (like RTSS microsecond-accurate) to keep the pulldown consistent, can intensify the double-image effect for odd divisors of frame rate on fixed-Hz

When you enable VRR for 160fps@240Hz, the double-image effect diminishes or disappears. When you disable VRR for 160fps@240Hz and use VSYNC ON instead, the double-image effect reappears (2:1:2:1:2:1 pulldown...)

The 2:1 pulldown has two different stutter amplitudes. One stutter amplitude is twice as wide as the other stutter amplitude. If both stutter frequencies are high enough, both of them blends into motion blur. You now have a thinner motion blur overlapping a thicker motion blur. Voila. Another cause of double image effect that doesn't need strobing. See?

I should create new TestUFO motion tests that demonstrates simultaneous stutter harmonic frequencies / beat frequencies. It's a rather interesting science for ultra-Hz researchers. Often unimportant to many, but it very nicely explains the "double image effect" very nicely for non-impulsed displays (e.g. not using ULMB).

Once we're using 1000fps+ at 1000Hz+ all of this practically doesn't really matter, but we're still at the brunt of beat-frequency and harmonic-frequency motion artifacts even at 240Hz and 480Hz, in this current Refresh Rate Race to future Retina Refresh Rates.

</Blur Busters Technology Pandora Box>

That concludes a behind-the-scenes explanation. Enjoy.

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 06 Mar 2019, 17:40
by knypol
So with Gsync at 240Hz its better to use 120fps rather than 160? After my tests beyond 144fps image starts to blurry with judder/stutter. Its really strange that other game like BF1 has no such problem. But Apex is taxing my GPU a lot more than BF1 and that might be a problem.

Perfectly for me would be to use ULMB but sadly input lag for fps games is just to noticable. Tried scanline sync (rtss) and limiting fps just below refresh rate but it doesnt please me. Only full VSync is acceptable for ULMB.

Edit. In other words. Vrr removes tearing but when fps are changing alot I can see double.images? So the best solution is to find lowest fps and cap the game on that level?

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 15 Mar 2019, 09:21
by Sanhaii
Notty_PT wrote:NO problem! We are here to help, share and collect information! My setup right now on Apex is:

. +fps_max 138 -> 138fps cap
. Gsync (Driver)
. ViewSonic XG2402 144hz
. Low Settings 1080p

Smooth as butter, I only drop to 110-120fps when on the jump section (looking at the whole map from above, wich stresses GPU a lot).

Been easier to aim this way, compared to 240hz + uncapped wich is a mess for muscle memory (mouse sensitivity/response), altho the input lag was lower this way. But altho input lag is one of the most important, if not the most important aspects for good aim, at some point is not worth it to gain 2ms less input lag, wich comes with judder/stutter and bad mouse behaviour due to the frames/hz inconsistency, like I mentioned on that thread that I created.

I can´t stress this enough, even for pro players playing competitive. Having a steady framerate and USING Gsync/FreeSync, is a must for your aim. Trust me. Even if you notice the mouse a tiny bit laggier compared to uncapped frames + 240hz.

If you can sustain 220-240fps at 240hz with big consistency tho, it is superior. Problem is having that situation on most modern engines. Almost an impossible task.
Hi, I've been trying to find a consistant setup for my monitor, im running an alienware 2518H at 240hz with gsync. I have well over 250 hours into apex, sadly my improvement is lacking. My aim seems to be inconsistent as people have described this could be due to my frames dropping suddenly. I run on a evga 1080ti and a 9900k, at 100% gpu usage explaining the drops sometimes. I can get up to 350 fps but go down to 120 aswel.

I see you recommend locking the fps at 144hz, should i consider also turning my monitor down to 144hz? If i can consistently get 144hz (if i lower settings i will never go below) Should i leave gsync off? I could run with ULMB since you look around alot in this game, but i'd say crosshair aiming is also very important so I might just not mess with that.
Basically just wondering if I should lower my monitor to 144hz or rock it at 240hz and cap the game at 144hz.

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 15 Mar 2019, 09:51
by jorimt
Sanhaii wrote:Basically just wondering if I should lower my monitor to 144hz or rock it at 240hz and cap the game at 144hz.
Notty_PT is using a native 144Hz monitor in that specific setup, which is why his configuration is 138 FPS @144Hz.

However, since you have a 240Hz monitor, you'll want to keep it at 240Hz, since due to its faster scanout (4.2ms scanout vs. 6.9ms scanout of native 144Hz refresh rate), 240Hz scans in/delivers frames faster, regardless of framerate; e.g. 144 FPS @240Hz w/VRR (G-SYNC/FreeSync) still has less input lag than an equivalent 141 FPS at 144Hz w/VRR (G-SYNC/FreeSync).

So 240Hz G-SYNC with a 144 FPS limit is the optimal setup in this case, at least if you're looking for the lowest input lag/fastest input response with that configuration.

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 15 Mar 2019, 17:29
by Notty_PT
Sanhaii wrote:
Notty_PT wrote:NO problem! We are here to help, share and collect information! My setup right now on Apex is:

. +fps_max 138 -> 138fps cap
. Gsync (Driver)
. ViewSonic XG2402 144hz
. Low Settings 1080p

Smooth as butter, I only drop to 110-120fps when on the jump section (looking at the whole map from above, wich stresses GPU a lot).

Been easier to aim this way, compared to 240hz + uncapped wich is a mess for muscle memory (mouse sensitivity/response), altho the input lag was lower this way. But altho input lag is one of the most important, if not the most important aspects for good aim, at some point is not worth it to gain 2ms less input lag, wich comes with judder/stutter and bad mouse behaviour due to the frames/hz inconsistency, like I mentioned on that thread that I created.

I can´t stress this enough, even for pro players playing competitive. Having a steady framerate and USING Gsync/FreeSync, is a must for your aim. Trust me. Even if you notice the mouse a tiny bit laggier compared to uncapped frames + 240hz.

If you can sustain 220-240fps at 240hz with big consistency tho, it is superior. Problem is having that situation on most modern engines. Almost an impossible task.
Hi, I've been trying to find a consistant setup for my monitor, im running an alienware 2518H at 240hz with gsync. I have well over 250 hours into apex, sadly my improvement is lacking. My aim seems to be inconsistent as people have described this could be due to my frames dropping suddenly. I run on a evga 1080ti and a 9900k, at 100% gpu usage explaining the drops sometimes. I can get up to 350 fps but go down to 120 aswel.

I see you recommend locking the fps at 144hz, should i consider also turning my monitor down to 144hz? If i can consistently get 144hz (if i lower settings i will never go below) Should i leave gsync off? I could run with ULMB since you look around alot in this game, but i'd say crosshair aiming is also very important so I might just not mess with that.
Basically just wondering if I should lower my monitor to 144hz or rock it at 240hz and cap the game at 144hz.
If your monitor has no problem with Gsync + 144fps cap + 240hz refresh rate, then this is the best possible solution! That´s if the monitor handles the overdrive correctly at 144fps @ 240hz. Most 240hz monitors don´t, so you will have to find out if it bothers you or not.

One thing I can assure you, Apex is clearly a 144fps cap game. Even the devs locked it to 144 by default. We can overcome that with commands, but the engine is not ready/optimized for that. That´s why stutters happen all the time once you go past 144, even with a steady 160 framerate, for example.

Re: Apex Legends Optimal Settings for 240hz G-Sync Monitors

Posted: 02 Apr 2019, 13:26
by cheater
Hi, I registered to let you know that Apex is raising the fps cap to 300. The team posted this in an update last Thursday (28 March 2019).

Original post:
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discu ... 996#M17255
FRAME RATE CAPPED TO 144 ON PC

In the last patch we made an update with the intent to cap frames at 300 if players bypassed the default 144 frames per second. This introduced a bug that capped frames to 144 regardless if players uncapped it or not. In the next patch we’ll be fixing this so the cap is 300 as intended.