https://www.blurbusters.com/gsync/gsync ... ettings/6/RealNC wrote:Which of the charts?TTT wrote:So Gsync off 240hz capped to 100fps, is getting the same scanouts and everything as Gsync on 240hz capped to 100fps, but Gsync on adds a bit of input lag at the lower frames from looking at the comparison charts.
G-SYNC and mouse cursor
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
I don't see it. Seems to have no added lag:
https://www.blurbusters.com/wp-content/ ... -240Hz.png
I guess you were looking at the 60Hz g-sync chart? Don't use 60Hz with g-sync. Makes no sense to begin with
https://www.blurbusters.com/wp-content/ ... -240Hz.png
I guess you were looking at the 60Hz g-sync chart? Don't use 60Hz with g-sync. Makes no sense to begin with
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
Ah so the charts are locked refresh on each one!RealNC wrote:I don't see it. Seems to have no added lag:
https://www.blurbusters.com/wp-content/ ... -240Hz.png
I guess you were looking at the 60Hz g-sync chart? Don't use 60Hz with g-sync. Makes no sense to begin with
So the amount of lag Gsync will give with the fps cap down to like 100-120 with the screen at 240hz in NVP is the same as it is at 238?
To be honest I don't game that much but ever since I got this screen I set it up exactly as the guides say but it makes it feel way less responsive, especially in twitchy quick FPS games I can't fine aim at all.
Maybe its just me but I do remember seeing a few threads somewhere with other people saying at lower fps caps this monitor(XB252Q) feels laggier and worse than a 144hz does at the same levels. My other monitor is a 60hz Benq though so I can't really compare.
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
Of course not. 100FPS naturally has more input lag that 200FPS. But 240Hz g-sync at 100FPS will give you better input lag than 100Hz at 100FPS. G-Sync removes vsync lag. It cannot remove lower vs higher FPS lag.TTT wrote:So the amount of lag Gsync will give with the fps cap down to like 100-120 with the screen at 240hz in NVP is the same as it is at 238?
Depends on what you compare it with. If you compare 100FPS capped g-sync vs 100FPS capped non-gsync, there should be no difference. But if you're comparing it to uncapped FPS, then it's going to have higher lag, obviously.To be honest I don't game that much but ever since I got this screen I set it up exactly as the guides say but it makes it feel way less responsive, especially in twitchy quick FPS games I can't fine aim at all.
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
Correct.
The confusion between frequency and duration.
scanout frequency = the refresh rate
scanout interval = the amount of time per refresh cycle (can be a number less than 1/Hz)
This is what GSYNC 100fps at 144Hz looks like.
(Essentially a graphed representation of high speed video of scanout latency -- but for a 100fps at 144Hz GSYNC)
scanout frequency = 100 times a second (100Hz refresh rate)
scanout duration = 1/144sec (the scanout velocity of 144Hz even though we're only doing 100Hz).
The confusion between frequency and duration.
scanout frequency = the refresh rate
scanout interval = the amount of time per refresh cycle (can be a number less than 1/Hz)
This is what GSYNC 100fps at 144Hz looks like.
(Essentially a graphed representation of high speed video of scanout latency -- but for a 100fps at 144Hz GSYNC)
scanout frequency = 100 times a second (100Hz refresh rate)
scanout duration = 1/144sec (the scanout velocity of 144Hz even though we're only doing 100Hz).
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
^ Ain't it fun?
G-SYNC can alter the repetition of these individual cycles per second, but it can't change the duration of each cycle, so if you're at 240Hz, it's still scanning in at 4.2ms per with G-SYNC, etc, regardless of framerate.
Also, yes, in those charts, if it says "60Hz," that means I physically changed the max refresh rate in the control panel before testing, so the the lower max refresh rate, the slower scanout, and the slower the scanout, the more input lag there is at the same framerate when compared to higher max refresh rates with G-SYNC.
While it looks like the Chief and RealNC have cleared most of it up, for the record, yes, when I said "scanout repetition," I was referring to the amount of times the scanout cycle was being repeated per second.TTT wrote:Ah yea you are just talking about refresh, but still Jor said:
"With VRR, if the framerate is 40, for instance, the scanout is repeating 40 times per second (at least until you get to minimum refresh/LFC, where frame doubling occurs; the starting point of which varies per VRR method and/or panel tolerance)."
This is what I am referring to.
G-SYNC can alter the repetition of these individual cycles per second, but it can't change the duration of each cycle, so if you're at 240Hz, it's still scanning in at 4.2ms per with G-SYNC, etc, regardless of framerate.
Also, yes, in those charts, if it says "60Hz," that means I physically changed the max refresh rate in the control panel before testing, so the the lower max refresh rate, the slower scanout, and the slower the scanout, the more input lag there is at the same framerate when compared to higher max refresh rates with G-SYNC.
(jorimt: /jor-uhm-tee/)
Author: Blur Busters "G-SYNC 101" Series
Displays: ASUS PG27AQN, LG 48CX VR: Beyond, Quest 3, Reverb G2, Index OS: Windows 11 Pro Case: Fractal Design Torrent PSU: Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 MB: ASUS Z790 Hero CPU: Intel i9-13900k w/Noctua NH-U12A GPU: GIGABYTE RTX 4090 GAMING OC RAM: 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 DDR5 6400MHz CL32 SSDs: 2TB WD_BLACK SN850 (OS), 4TB WD_BLACK SN850X (Games) Keyboards: Wooting 60HE, Logitech G915 TKL Mice: Razer Viper Mini SE, Razer Viper 8kHz Sound: Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2 (speakers/amp/DAC), AFUL Performer 8 (IEMs)
Author: Blur Busters "G-SYNC 101" Series
Displays: ASUS PG27AQN, LG 48CX VR: Beyond, Quest 3, Reverb G2, Index OS: Windows 11 Pro Case: Fractal Design Torrent PSU: Seasonic PRIME TX-1000 MB: ASUS Z790 Hero CPU: Intel i9-13900k w/Noctua NH-U12A GPU: GIGABYTE RTX 4090 GAMING OC RAM: 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 DDR5 6400MHz CL32 SSDs: 2TB WD_BLACK SN850 (OS), 4TB WD_BLACK SN850X (Games) Keyboards: Wooting 60HE, Logitech G915 TKL Mice: Razer Viper Mini SE, Razer Viper 8kHz Sound: Creative Sound Blaster Katana V2 (speakers/amp/DAC), AFUL Performer 8 (IEMs)
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
I'm glad to see this topic already here because I've been having an issue with gsync and haven't been able to find any info about it outside of this thread!
I recently picked up a Dell 144Hz freesync display and enabled gsync. Followed the 101 guide and enabled RTSS for a 140Hz cap, enabled vsync ON in NCP, and the pendulum demo is clearly syncing. However I feel gsync is not working in quite a few games I've wanted to play with gsync, and it comes down to the mouse movement. Many PC games I play are mouse based. The Sims 4, Tropico 6, Cities Skylines, Anno 1800 just to name a few. I have a GTX1080 so these games generally run with high refresh rates, but like all sim games, will eventually fall down around 50-80FPS once you have something built up - this is why I was looking forward to a VRR display. They start out so smooth but quickly devolve into a stuttery mess regardless of hardware horsepower.
I've noticed these games all don't seem to be benefiting from gsync enabled, even though the gsync indicator says it's active. I felt that the image was just as stuttery in gsync mode when panning the camera around as it is without gsync. (and I have vsync off in all games) What finally tipped me off was that the mouse cursor was still clearly 144Hz, even when I purposely tanked my framerate to 50FPS. RealNC confirmed the obvious here - if the monitor refresh rate was properly changing then the mouse cursor movement should be changing along with it! The fact that the cursor is staying silky smooth regardless of framerate in the game tells me that the refresh rate isn't syncing to the game FPS, and perhaps instead syncing to the UI FPS which is always the refresh rate of the monitor?
Some other games like Killing Floor 2 are very clearly benefiting from gsync during gameplay, where the framerate is all over the place between 80-120FPS yet the on screen image is remaining consistently smooth (and it's an amazing sight!) and in this game, indeed I can visually see the mouse cursor fluidity being affected along with game frame rate.
I'm absolutely willing to trade the silky smooth mouse cursor for a consistent image in game, but I can't seem to combine the two. Is there something I'm missing, or is this simply how some games operate and are essentially incompatible with gsync/freesync as a result? Is there some known method or tool I can run that'll force gsync and/or the game to synchronize with the framerate of the actual game world, rather than the framerate of what appears to be some kind of separated UI layer? Because as it stands, it looks like this entire strategy/sim genre receives no fluidity benefit with variable refresh rates and ends up looking identical to fixed refresh rate performance.
I recently picked up a Dell 144Hz freesync display and enabled gsync. Followed the 101 guide and enabled RTSS for a 140Hz cap, enabled vsync ON in NCP, and the pendulum demo is clearly syncing. However I feel gsync is not working in quite a few games I've wanted to play with gsync, and it comes down to the mouse movement. Many PC games I play are mouse based. The Sims 4, Tropico 6, Cities Skylines, Anno 1800 just to name a few. I have a GTX1080 so these games generally run with high refresh rates, but like all sim games, will eventually fall down around 50-80FPS once you have something built up - this is why I was looking forward to a VRR display. They start out so smooth but quickly devolve into a stuttery mess regardless of hardware horsepower.
I've noticed these games all don't seem to be benefiting from gsync enabled, even though the gsync indicator says it's active. I felt that the image was just as stuttery in gsync mode when panning the camera around as it is without gsync. (and I have vsync off in all games) What finally tipped me off was that the mouse cursor was still clearly 144Hz, even when I purposely tanked my framerate to 50FPS. RealNC confirmed the obvious here - if the monitor refresh rate was properly changing then the mouse cursor movement should be changing along with it! The fact that the cursor is staying silky smooth regardless of framerate in the game tells me that the refresh rate isn't syncing to the game FPS, and perhaps instead syncing to the UI FPS which is always the refresh rate of the monitor?
Some other games like Killing Floor 2 are very clearly benefiting from gsync during gameplay, where the framerate is all over the place between 80-120FPS yet the on screen image is remaining consistently smooth (and it's an amazing sight!) and in this game, indeed I can visually see the mouse cursor fluidity being affected along with game frame rate.
I'm absolutely willing to trade the silky smooth mouse cursor for a consistent image in game, but I can't seem to combine the two. Is there something I'm missing, or is this simply how some games operate and are essentially incompatible with gsync/freesync as a result? Is there some known method or tool I can run that'll force gsync and/or the game to synchronize with the framerate of the actual game world, rather than the framerate of what appears to be some kind of separated UI layer? Because as it stands, it looks like this entire strategy/sim genre receives no fluidity benefit with variable refresh rates and ends up looking identical to fixed refresh rate performance.
Last edited by technick on 28 Jul 2019, 03:14, edited 2 times in total.
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
(Never mind. I misread your post. I missed the part where you mention your mouse cursor.)
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Re: G-SYNC and mouse cursor
Have you tried putting the NCP Vsync setting to use 3D application and turn on Vsync in game?technick wrote:I'm glad to see this topic already here because I've been having an issue with gsync and haven't been able to find any info about it outside of this thread!
I recently picked up a Dell 144Hz freesync display and enabled gsync. Followed the 101 guide and enabled RTSS for a 140Hz cap, enabled vsync ON in NCP, and the pendulum demo is clearly syncing. However I feel gsync is not working in quite a few games I've wanted to play with gsync, and it comes down to the mouse movement. Many PC games I play are mouse based. The Sims 4, Tropico 6, Cities Skylines, Anno 1800 just to name a few. I have a GTX1080 so these games generally run with high refresh rates, but like all sim games, will eventually fall down around 50-80FPS once you have something built up - this is why I was looking forward to a VRR display. They start out so smooth but quickly devolve into a stuttery mess regardless of hardware horsepower.
I've noticed these games all don't seem to be benefiting from gsync enabled, even though the gsync indicator says it's active. I felt that the image was just as stuttery in gsync mode when panning the camera around as it is without gsync. (and I have vsync off in all games) What finally tipped me off was that the mouse cursor was still clearly 144Hz, even when I purposely tanked my framerate to 50FPS. RealNC confirmed the obvious here - if the monitor refresh rate was properly changing then the mouse cursor movement should be changing along with it! The fact that the cursor is staying silky smooth regardless of framerate in the game tells me that the refresh rate isn't syncing to the game FPS, and perhaps instead syncing to the UI FPS which is always the refresh rate of the monitor?
Some other games like Killing Floor 2 are very clearly benefiting from gsync during gameplay, where the framerate is all over the place between 80-120FPS yet the on screen image is remaining consistently smooth (and it's an amazing sight!) and in this game, indeed I can visually see the mouse cursor fluidity being affected along with game frame rate.
I'm absolutely willing to trade the silky smooth mouse cursor for a consistent image in game, but I can't seem to combine the two. Is there something I'm missing, or is this simply how some games operate and are essentially incompatible with gsync/freesync as a result? Is there some known method or tool I can run that'll force gsync and/or the game to synchronize with the framerate of the actual game world, rather than the framerate of what appears to be some kind of separated UI layer? Because as it stands, it looks like this entire strategy/sim genre receives no fluidity benefit with variable refresh rates and ends up looking identical to fixed refresh rate performance.