4.4 TRILLION frames per second video camera

Advanced display talk, display hackers, advanced game programmers, scientists, display researchers, display manufacturers, vision researchers & Advanced Display Articles on Blur Busters. The masters on Blur Busters.
Post Reply
spacediver
Posts: 505
Joined: 18 Dec 2013, 23:51

4.4 TRILLION frames per second video camera

Post by spacediver » 14 Aug 2014, 23:51

http://www.iflscience.com/technology/wo ... mes-second

Not quite sure how it works, but it might be related to this:

http://www.ted.com/talks/ramesh_raskar_ ... per_second
Top
User avatar
RealNC
Site Admin
Posts: 3756
Joined: 24 Dec 2013, 18:32
Contact:
Contact RealNC

Re: 4.4 TRILLION frames per second video camera

Post by RealNC » 15 Aug 2014, 09:26

Chief should get one, for latency measurements :mrgreen:
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Top
User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 11653
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:
Contact Chief Blur Buster

Re: 4.4 TRILLION frames per second video camera

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 15 Aug 2014, 18:29

Imagine me saying... "My monitor has 3,713,984,276 picoseconds of input lag!"

Oops, I moved my monitor a few inches away from my eyes, and gained many more picoseconds of input lag from the light speed over extra viewing distance... :lol:
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Top
User avatar
RealNC
Site Admin
Posts: 3756
Joined: 24 Dec 2013, 18:32
Contact:
Contact RealNC

Re: 4.4 TRILLION frames per second video camera

Post by RealNC » 15 Aug 2014, 21:51

Chief Blur Buster wrote:Imagine me saying... "My monitor has 3,713,984,276 picoseconds of input lag!"

Oops, I moved my monitor a few inches away from my eyes, and gained many more picoseconds of input lag from the light speed over extra viewing distance... :lol:
Light travels slower through the panel cover, so best to remove that as well.
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Area 51: Display Science, Research & Engineering”