Test for those who are skeptical about EMI and tweaks

Separate area for niche lag issues including unexpected causes and/or electromagnetic interference (ECC = retransmits = lag). Interference (EMI, EMF) of all kinds (wired, wireless, external, internal, environment, bad component) can cause error-correction latencies like a bad modem connection. Troubleshooting may require university degree. Your lag issue is likely not EMI. Please read this before entering sub-forum.
Forum rules
IMPORTANT:
This subforum is for advanced users only. This separate area is for niche or unexpected lag issues such as electromagnetic interference (EMI, EMF, electrical, radiofrequency, etc). Interference of all kinds (wired, wireless, external, internal, environment, bad component) can cause error-correction (ECC) latencies like a bad modem connection, except internally in a circuit. ECC = retransmits = lag. Troubleshooting may require university degree. Your lag issue is likely not EMI.
🠚 You Must Read This First Before Submit Post or Submit Reply
Post Reply
cursed-gamer
Posts: 239
Joined: 16 Aug 2023, 13:07

Test for those who are skeptical about EMI and tweaks

Post by cursed-gamer » 19 May 2024, 14:41

Yesterday during faceit session one of my teammates had speakers on so I could hear myself. There would be nothing concerning about it if weren't for the fact, that I could hear what I say after 2 seconds delay. Assuming that mine and his ping were about ~30 ms, at best, the total travel time of my voice and back shouldn't be more than 200 ms. Voice chat in CS2 uses UDP protocol according to the informations I found.

That's the simplified path of my voice.

voice generated :arrow: server :arrow: voice received and sended back at the same time + input lag :arrow: server :arrow: voice received

Do a test with your friend on a faceit server or any other that is not located in your vicinity. Record a sound track with OBS and analyse the time between microphone input and your voice received. If the time is much higher than expected, then the answer lies in the quality of your internet connection.

Good luck

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 12266
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Test for those who are skeptical about EMI and tweaks

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 19 May 2024, 16:44

Wrong forum area, moved.

Discussion of EMI (including legitimate solutions) should be in the other forum area.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on: BlueSky | Twitter | Facebook

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Thatweirdinputlag
Posts: 334
Joined: 27 Aug 2021, 14:09

Re: Test for those who are skeptical about EMI and tweaks

Post by Thatweirdinputlag » 19 May 2024, 20:27

cursed-gamer wrote: ↑
19 May 2024, 14:41
Yesterday during faceit session one of my teammates had speakers on so I could hear myself. There would be nothing concerning about it if weren't for the fact, that I could hear what I say after 2 seconds delay. Assuming that mine and his ping were about ~30 ms, at best, the total travel time of my voice and back shouldn't be more than 200 ms. Voice chat in CS2 uses UDP protocol according to the informations I found.

That's the simplified path of my voice.

voice generated :arrow: server :arrow: voice received and sended back at the same time + input lag :arrow: server :arrow: voice received

Do a test with your friend on a faceit server or any other that is not located in your vicinity. Record a sound track with OBS and analyse the time between microphone input and your voice received. If the time is much higher than expected, then the answer lies in the quality of your internet connection.

Good luck
Even if it's the same connection to the server, in theory, I don't think all packets are the same! Neither in their marking or priority not even the same UDP port lol. I would assume something as voice chat would have the least priority to be processed on the server level. However, 2 seconds is still a lot.

cursed-gamer
Posts: 239
Joined: 16 Aug 2023, 13:07

Re: Test for those who are skeptical about EMI and tweaks

Post by cursed-gamer » 20 May 2024, 04:02

Comms are crucial. The delay was indeed high. I said something like β€žI’m gonna smoke ramp” and then after 2s break I heard my it in my headphones.

Post Reply