Not an EMI thread - Terminal slug cursor is PSU resistance based, not interference based

Everything about latency. This section is mainly user/consumer discussion. (Peer-reviewed scientific discussion should go in Laboratory section). Tips, mouse lag, display lag, game engine lag, network lag, whole input lag chain, VSYNC OFF vs VSYNC ON, and more! Input Lag Articles on Blur Busters.
Mr1991
Posts: 186
Joined: 24 Nov 2019, 10:10

Re: Not an EMI thread - Terminal slug cursor is PSU resistance based, not interference based

Post by Mr1991 » 12 Feb 2024, 11:24

Vocaleyes wrote:
11 Feb 2024, 13:52
Ok, so let me rephrase my initial statement, I wish there were compatible & usable 2.0 drivers for windows 10/11 as currently they are seemingly handled by the 3.0 drivers, which I would like to test to see if there's an issue there.

"If you’re talking about Microsoft’s 2.0 drivers they are always on windows installs and can be accessed through device manager" I'm talking about any 2.0 driver that handles 2.0 ports that I can use.
So you’re using an actual usb 2.0 port, but Windows is using the 3.0 drivers?

It’s most likely motherboard specific, my old Asus board can use it in windows 10 I believe, but it’s way older, in all honestly you’d probably have to test it, but I’d probably have a ps/2 keyboard or mouse ready in case it locks you out and there’s no way to revert it

Vocaleyes
Posts: 457
Joined: 09 Nov 2021, 18:10

Re: Not an EMI thread - Terminal slug cursor is PSU resistance based, not interference based

Post by Vocaleyes » 28 Feb 2024, 01:41

So you’re using an actual usb 2.0 port, but Windows is using the 3.0 drivers?
Correcto, the complete list of devices are intel's extensible host 3.1, root hub 3.0 and 5 usb composite devices, and looking through the device manager's driver list even with "compatable" unchekced, there seem to be no alternate 2.0 drivers listed.

Lefti99
Posts: 1
Joined: 15 Jun 2024, 11:29

Re: Not an EMI thread - Terminal slug cursor is PSU resistance based, not interference based

Post by Lefti99 » 15 Jun 2024, 13:02

r0ach wrote:
31 Jan 2024, 15:09
So I've used all kinds of power supplies from beefy EVGA 1300w G2's, to ATX 3.0 Channelwells, to Corsair platinum SF600/SF750 series, to Seasonics, Superflower Leadex, etc. I ended up with a Superflower Leadex III gold as a backup unit while my Corsair was being RMA'd and even though this PSU is supposed to be ranked very highly, cursor movement is pretty much garbage on it.

Why is it garbage? The first likely suspect is that the higher end Corsairs use 16 AWG cables for things like PCIE and CPU while this turd Superflower uses 18 AWG. You can literally feel the increased resistance while moving the mouse. It comes in the form of both decreased granularity for cursor movement as well as just more disconnected/floatier cursor movement in general. I opened up one of the Superflower cables and see that they also use tinned copper as well.

18 AWG cables have 60% more resistance than 16 AWG, then tinned copper is 15% as conductive as bare copper on top of that. So if one brand of PSU uses 16 AWG + bare copper and another brand uses 18 AWG + tinned copper, you're looking at clown world levels of increased electrical resistance and your PC will feel unusable. A normie engineer specs things like 18 AWG as 'usable' for a Linux email server while not causing a fire. It's not actually usable for a gaming PC.

Next subject is the power cord itself. I have 18, 16, and 14 AWG cables and there's tremendous difference between which one you plug in to a PSU (one that doesn't actually need higher than 18 AWG for load). You see the same phenomenon here where you can feel cursor granularity increase each time you go to a bigger size. You will probably also see voltages slightly change in the BIOS as well.

The power cable subject is NOT as cut and dry as internal cables, though. I would say you ALWAYS want 16 AWG PCIE and CPU cables and should never go near companies using 18 AWG ones or tinned copper for that matter. Send them hate mail. If your current PSU uses this, your mouse movement will likely always be trash. Doubly so if it's tinned copper on top of that.

For the actual power cord, tossing a 14 AWG cable onto a PSU that uses an 18 AWG one by default can actually feel detrimental. Cursor movement will be extra slippery and wild. I didn't really see this kind of behavior on a 1300 watter that uses one by default, so doing it on a smaller PSU might be throwing some voltages out of whack. I believe in-cable capacitors probably cause resistance problems that board capacitors don't, so those should likely be avoided.

Before the inevitable "what PSU should I buy" posts come. Channelwell platform is used for most of the new ATX 3.0's and seem to have huge problems with causing coil whine. I had one that had LOUD coil whine just sitting at idle which I've never seen on any PSU before. So even though Corsair is usually one of the better companies for thick cables, this will likely affect tons of Corsair PSUs + their RME line using a different company also has the same problem, as well as pricey Seasonic Vertex. You can always buy and return these brands if they do have it and eventually they'll get the message and fix it.

FSP Hydro PTM X Pro don't seem to have the coil whine problem and have 16 AWG cables (at least on the 1000w unit, not sure about 850w), so that's really the only new age potentially safe PSU I know of. If their cables are tinned copper you would still probably be screwed with gimped mouse movement, though. Someone will need to email all these race to the bottom trash companies and force them to give up the info of what their cables are made of.
Hello, I have been following this forum for a long time. It is a very helpful forum. You wrote that the power supply from FSP PTM X PRO 1000 Watt has the 18 AWG cables. I have the FSP PTM PRO without X. Are they the same? I have massive problems with my new PC with the game Battlefield 2042. I have a powerful PC CPU i7 13700KF RTX 4080 motherboard Asus Prime Z790 Prime-P DDR 5 32 GB Kingston. At the beginning when I assembled the components everything was actually fine but after that I could not hit anything. The mouse felt strange. I have tried 3 mice and everything is the same. But what is strange is that where I live is a newly built apartment, on the wall next to the PC table there is a roller blind switch and when I operate it and the roller blind goes down the monitor goes off for a few seconds and then it goes back on. Does this have something to do with the power supply? do? What I noticed is that the +5V and the 3V rail are lower. I would be very grateful for your answers. Greetings from Germany. I forgot to say that I am currently using the power supply from EVGA Supernova P6 1000W

User avatar
Slender
Posts: 1673
Joined: 25 Jan 2020, 17:55

Re: Not an EMI thread - Terminal slug cursor is PSU resistance based, not interference based

Post by Slender » 16 Jun 2024, 13:39

Lefti99 wrote:
15 Jun 2024, 13:02
r0ach wrote:
31 Jan 2024, 15:09
So I've used all kinds of power supplies from beefy EVGA 1300w G2's, to ATX 3.0 Channelwells, to Corsair platinum SF600/SF750 series, to Seasonics, Superflower Leadex, etc. I ended up with a Superflower Leadex III gold as a backup unit while my Corsair was being RMA'd and even though this PSU is supposed to be ranked very highly, cursor movement is pretty much garbage on it.

Why is it garbage? The first likely suspect is that the higher end Corsairs use 16 AWG cables for things like PCIE and CPU while this turd Superflower uses 18 AWG. You can literally feel the increased resistance while moving the mouse. It comes in the form of both decreased granularity for cursor movement as well as just more disconnected/floatier cursor movement in general. I opened up one of the Superflower cables and see that they also use tinned copper as well.

18 AWG cables have 60% more resistance than 16 AWG, then tinned copper is 15% as conductive as bare copper on top of that. So if one brand of PSU uses 16 AWG + bare copper and another brand uses 18 AWG + tinned copper, you're looking at clown world levels of increased electrical resistance and your PC will feel unusable. A normie engineer specs things like 18 AWG as 'usable' for a Linux email server while not causing a fire. It's not actually usable for a gaming PC.

Next subject is the power cord itself. I have 18, 16, and 14 AWG cables and there's tremendous difference between which one you plug in to a PSU (one that doesn't actually need higher than 18 AWG for load). You see the same phenomenon here where you can feel cursor granularity increase each time you go to a bigger size. You will probably also see voltages slightly change in the BIOS as well.

The power cable subject is NOT as cut and dry as internal cables, though. I would say you ALWAYS want 16 AWG PCIE and CPU cables and should never go near companies using 18 AWG ones or tinned copper for that matter. Send them hate mail. If your current PSU uses this, your mouse movement will likely always be trash. Doubly so if it's tinned copper on top of that.

For the actual power cord, tossing a 14 AWG cable onto a PSU that uses an 18 AWG one by default can actually feel detrimental. Cursor movement will be extra slippery and wild. I didn't really see this kind of behavior on a 1300 watter that uses one by default, so doing it on a smaller PSU might be throwing some voltages out of whack. I believe in-cable capacitors probably cause resistance problems that board capacitors don't, so those should likely be avoided.

Before the inevitable "what PSU should I buy" posts come. Channelwell platform is used for most of the new ATX 3.0's and seem to have huge problems with causing coil whine. I had one that had LOUD coil whine just sitting at idle which I've never seen on any PSU before. So even though Corsair is usually one of the better companies for thick cables, this will likely affect tons of Corsair PSUs + their RME line using a different company also has the same problem, as well as pricey Seasonic Vertex. You can always buy and return these brands if they do have it and eventually they'll get the message and fix it.

FSP Hydro PTM X Pro don't seem to have the coil whine problem and have 16 AWG cables (at least on the 1000w unit, not sure about 850w), so that's really the only new age potentially safe PSU I know of. If their cables are tinned copper you would still probably be screwed with gimped mouse movement, though. Someone will need to email all these race to the bottom trash companies and force them to give up the info of what their cables are made of.
Hello, I have been following this forum for a long time. It is a very helpful forum. You wrote that the power supply from FSP PTM X PRO 1000 Watt has the 18 AWG cables. I have the FSP PTM PRO without X. Are they the same? I have massive problems with my new PC with the game Battlefield 2042. I have a powerful PC CPU i7 13700KF RTX 4080 motherboard Asus Prime Z790 Prime-P DDR 5 32 GB Kingston. At the beginning when I assembled the components everything was actually fine but after that I could not hit anything. The mouse felt strange. I have tried 3 mice and everything is the same. But what is strange is that where I live is a newly built apartment, on the wall next to the PC table there is a roller blind switch and when I operate it and the roller blind goes down the monitor goes off for a few seconds and then it goes back on. Does this have something to do with the power supply? do? What I noticed is that the +5V and the 3V rail are lower. I would be very grateful for your answers. Greetings from Germany. I forgot to say that I am currently using the power supply from EVGA Supernova P6 1000W
when my ups going to battery mode monitor same have black switch

Sandy
Posts: 138
Joined: 30 Mar 2024, 02:14

Re: Not an EMI thread - Terminal slug cursor is PSU resistance based, not interference based

Post by Sandy » 22 Aug 2024, 02:22

I plan to test several power supplies recently. I hope they can solve my problem.

Post Reply