Windows Performance Analyzer shows negative DPC numbers on dxgkrnl.sys - Possibly an error of AMD drivers?

Everything about displays and monitors. 120Hz, 144Hz, 240Hz, 4K, 1440p, input lag, display shopping, monitor purchase decisions, compare, versus, debate, and more. Questions? Just ask!
Post Reply
User avatar
AlchemyTweaks
Posts: 3
Joined: 13 Jul 2022, 21:57
Location: Greece
Contact:

Windows Performance Analyzer shows negative DPC numbers on dxgkrnl.sys - Possibly an error of AMD drivers?

Post by AlchemyTweaks » 06 Aug 2024, 12:02

The beginning​
Let's start from the beginning. I use the Windows Performance Toolkit for performance analysis that I conduct systematically. Additionally, I use it for comparisons (before and after changes that I test). Recently, I decided to start taking measurements for this exact reason—to determine if a particular setting provides a detectable performance boost in the system.

User avatar
Chief Blur Buster
Site Admin
Posts: 12139
Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Windows Performance Analyzer shows negative DPC numbers on dxgkrnl.sys - Possibly an error of AMD drivers?

Post by Chief Blur Buster » 13 Aug 2024, 11:11

Monotonic counters (e.g. RTDSC) can tick out of phase on different cores of some CPUs.

When benchmarking utilities gets a timestamp from one core, and then afterwards a timestamp from a different core, you can get negative time deltas. Sometimes this is harmless and sometimes this is harmful. I don't have enough information if you're witnessing some glitching/issues from this.

For critical benchmarking, try forced thread affinity for critical DPC timestamping tasks. This will help avoid negative numbers in SOME cases. Obviously, don't do this if it isn't causing problems.

For programmers of benchmark utilities: Some APIs (e.g. QueryPerformanceCounter() for example) check against reverse-ticking at chip-level counter (e.g. RTDSC quirks on some multicore CPUs), so you can program benchmarking utilities that don't have side effects from backwards ticking.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on: BlueSky | Twitter | Facebook

Image
Forum Rules wrote:  1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
  2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
  3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!

Post Reply