@captain_amn
I would say, non strobed, 240hz is probably best monitor at the moment. Dunno about new Benqs, but they a lot more expensive.
Non strobed 120/144Hz sucks, for me, as they are blurry as hell for me(same with Benq)
Strobed...I'd say, strobed 120Hz, VT tweak 1499, my old Benq is little better(but only in middle) in clarity, while running ufo tests(moving photo -ufos, quebec or Eiffel tower, street map), LG 240Hz has less clarity, due ghosting, or, I would say, tripple images. Text in street map is more fuzzy, smeared, on LG than on Benq. IN MIDDLE, but, well, if u play games, in middle is where ur focus is. As for me, in games, I barely see difference. I mean, playing 240Hz strobed/non strobed is great, have good results, that yesterday went from high 5-7k/d ratio to 1-2 only, due my fatigue...was playing/testing like 8h with some small breaks...So Id say, I have similar results, so, blurrines/smearing is not noticable in game as much as in ufo tests. Did VT trick too here, but seems to do nothing to size of crosstalk or maybe I looking wrong direction
Big pro is brightness, is more bright and colours more natural looking than my Benq 2720z, even after my so so DIY callibration.
Default sharpness suck, 50 makes things blurry, even my son when looked at screen for 5 secs noticed it right away, and he is using Samsung 27" CFG73 with Qdot Led and this crap is blurry with text as hell. But he like it for Rainbow Six Siege/Daying light/CS:GO and have good results too, so...maybe it is youth...
So for me, it is (rather) good monitor, but have mixed feelings. Esp with that dust/whatever just under LCD layer. At least it is not a bug...so is small, 1,5px size...I will test it more though, have 30 days to return it. Maybe in this time freaking JOLED finally start selling Oled gamers monitors... Maybe I will keep, maybe not. So far, mixed feelings...
lill edit, missed proper name